But what if, hypothetically speaking, one was to find even more filthy Liberal feet pics for sale on the free market? In that scenario it would only make economic and biological sense to follow one's alpha male instincts and participate in capitalism.
It all started by mocking TP USA's meme format and content. It took on a life of its own from there, typically by presenting equally ridiculous fabrications as factual.
Let's say, hypothetically, for the sake of argument, I was to take some shoes from a random member of congress, let's say, for an arbitrary example, AOC. And let's suppose I stole AOC’s shoes which, hypothetically would contain trace amounts of her DNA that would allow me to, hypothetically, create a tomboy clone of her that, hypothetically, would belittle and humiliate me and...
I was gonna say, Ben is famous for the arid conditions of his wive's hoo-ha mostly due to his covert affinity for the male form. Creating tomboy clones to step on his face sounds much more like it.
Is this the guy that someone out on a website where you can move the slider to change the size of his face, but the correct size is the one that looks the most wrong?
I feel like 103 or 104 looks the most like a real person but his facial features seem so inherently wrong regardless. The idea of getting uncanny valley feelings from a real person is so weird.
So, I looked through the fallacies on this page: https://iep.utm.edu/fallacy/
I couldn't find any that exactly matched what you're talking about (Your participation in the system implies your assent to the system) but I did find Tu Quoque (Your argument is invalid because you do the thing you're arguing against), which is pretty close
(Edit: your to you're)
A non sequitur fallacy is a statement or conclusion that does not follow logically from what preceded it. Non sequiturs can be responses that have nothing to do with the conversation or flawed conclusions “based” on what preceded them.
Toilet Paper USA
Oldest