bontchev ,
@bontchev@infosec.exchange avatar
thewolvesden ,
@thewolvesden@mstdn.social avatar

@bontchev Google's search engine can f--k right off, try Brave search engine, it uses its own index and they are big on privacy.

lindarosesmit ,
@lindarosesmit@mastodon.social avatar

@bontchev try duckduckgo. Easypeasu

xerge ,
@xerge@mastodon.nl avatar

@bontchev @touaregtweet does someone still have the code for altavista?

demofox ,
@demofox@mastodon.gamedev.place avatar

@bontchev this is so true, not even an exaggeration. How could we have prevented this?

TaoBear ,
@TaoBear@mastodon.social avatar

@bontchev I wish it worked that well today.

2CB ,
@2CB@urbanists.social avatar

@bontchev i recntly googled a 4-word description of exactly what I sought. I got a string if unrelated stuff, each with only one of the words. Of course I dismissed and tried another way. But what is the point of giving me that dogs breakfast of a response? Do they get paid by the advertiser for thrusting their shit at uninterested people?

blabberlicious ,
@blabberlicious@toot.community avatar

@bontchev
Let’s convert real websites to Wiki pages, and call it a day

ottaross ,
@ottaross@mastodon.social avatar

@bontchev interesting for the older folks is that this same graphic would apply to how met its end versus baby Google, sans the AI element.

Sadly in this version, the incumbent has weaseled itself into so many other facets of life that they'll be harder to displace.

WhyNotZoidberg ,
@WhyNotZoidberg@topspicy.social avatar

@bontchev "It is so much more optimized now"

NatureMC ,
@NatureMC@mastodon.online avatar
nusher ,
@nusher@mastodon.scot avatar

@bontchev Driving me nuts!

chris ,
@chris@social.uggs.io avatar

@bontchev You forgot the solution you WANT inside a 45 Minute long youtube Video.

Remember to click the bell and subscribe.

matt ,
@matt@oslo.town avatar

@bontchev @RachaelAva1024 Then they say “ten blue links” is a thing of the past. Now you should just go straight to our AI chatbot and ask. But realistically they haven’t been serving an accurate list of ten blue links for years.

sergio_101 ,
@sergio_101@social.sixdegreesofohio.com avatar

@bontchev

i kinda use chatgpt for everything anymore..

if it's something in a field i am totally clued out about, I will ask someone i know who is an expert..

screaminggoat ,
@screaminggoat@infosec.exchange avatar

@bontchev This should be correct to reflect the fact that the top sponsored result is malvertising.

vosje62 ,
@vosje62@mastodon.nl avatar

@bontchev @sjaakkeuvelaar Googles 'Altavista moment'.

25 years ago many people migrated from Altavista to Google is a short time.

DWTSquawk7600 ,
@DWTSquawk7600@worldkey.io avatar

@bontchev No lie detected…

tchauhan ,
@tchauhan@mastodon.mit.edu avatar

@bontchev Nothing of relevance appears on the right.

cindyyusa ,
@cindyyusa@mastodon.world avatar

@bontchev Stoped using it !! I do the u-tube but only though duck duck go and only after clearing history and set to no history. You are the PRODUCT why don't you get paid?🤬😖

nafnlaus ,
@nafnlaus@fosstodon.org avatar

@bontchev Lol, the internet was never like on the left. Early search was awful.

hitsuyonai ,
@hitsuyonai@mastodon.online avatar

@nafnlaus @bontchev
How early? AltaVista was, for a while, brilliant. Perhaps the job was easier then, prior to the 'dot com' boom, because the web was full of pretty much only real content.

nafnlaus ,
@nafnlaus@fosstodon.org avatar

@hitsuyonai @bontchev AltaVista was garbage, which is why everyone jumped ship to Google. Pre-pagerank search was just awful.

And no, the internet was never devoid of SEO. In fact, SEO used to be FAR easier before Pagerank. Even in the early days of pagerank, people immediately started gaming the system by loading each other's pages up with mutual links to climb the graph.

People need to stop looking at the past through rose-coloured glasses. The early internet was terrible.

woody ,

@nafnlaus @hitsuyonai @bontchev

I think you mean that the early web was terrible. I kinda liked email that worked, and MUDs and MOOs, and Usenet. And even Gopher, a little.

nafnlaus ,
@nafnlaus@fosstodon.org avatar

@woody @bontchev @hitsuyonai Email that worked on the early web, are you kidding me? I administered an email server at the time, it was a bloody nightmare. How have you memory holed the whole "confirmation emails often take hours to arrive if they ever even arrive at all" thing? And early spam filters were way worse than today, if you even had access to one at all.

MUDs and MOOs were certainly fun, mind you :) I had even more fun as a coder. LP MUD all the way - objects are OBJECTS!

woody ,

@nafnlaus @bontchev @hitsuyonai

I'm distinguishing between the "web," the "world wide web" of HTTP stuff, and the Internet more generally, which supports, and supported, many other kinds of standards-based communication. You appear to be saying that the early Internet was crap, and we're viewing it through rosy glasses. I would counter that it was not crap, it was actually quite pleasant, though on almost unrecognizably different terms. There weren't spam filters in the early Internet, because there wasn't spam on the early Internet. Finger worked because nobody cared whether someone knew that they were logged in, because that wasn't some kind of privacy violation, because we weren't thinking in those terms yet. There weren't "confirmation emails" because there wasn't a second-class of "unconfirmed" citizens.

The technology was simple, it didn't have a polished user interface, compiling cnews was a pain in the ass, there weren't search engines, because there wasn't an expectation that arbitrary information would be available online... you discovered things by word of mouth, and you were surprised and charmed to find them. Snoopy calendars!

It was a different time, the challenges were different ones, it's very difficult to make meaningful comparisons between the Internet of 1990 and the Internet of 2024. But in 1990, nobody's personal information was being sold, and nobody's thermostat was live-streaming video of the inside of their house, and nobody's vote was being manipulated by Russians and Facebook for pennies. And people weren't spending all day doomscrolling. Overall, I think it was a lot healthier.

nafnlaus ,
@nafnlaus@fosstodon.org avatar

@woody @bontchev @hitsuyonai

"There weren't spam filters in the early Internet, because there wasn't spam on the early Internet."

As someone who administered an email server, I don't think I can even read past this retcon. How can you have been alive then and not remember all the endless spam? People gathered emails everywhere and sent it en masse. After a trip to Japan where I had stayed at hostels, and some required email address, all of the sudden I got a new flood of spam in Japanese

woody ,

@nafnlaus @bontchev @hitsuyonai

I administered email servers throughout the 1980s, and I simply don't remember ever having any spam to deal with. I mean, I'm not saying there was none, just that I don't remember any, and it was not something that I needed to actually act upon until the mid-1990s.

bontchev OP ,
@bontchev@infosec.exchange avatar

@woody @nafnlaus @hitsuyonai Can confirm. Spam didn't exist in the '80. It didn't start becoming a problem, until that Green Card lawyer thought it a great marketing idea to spam all the USENET newsgroups.

nafnlaus ,
@nafnlaus@fosstodon.org avatar

@bontchev @woody @hitsuyonai I think we're talking about different timeperiods. I'm talking about the 1990s. As is anyone talking about Altavista, etc.

CurtAdams ,
@CurtAdams@urbanists.social avatar

@bontchev You're too optimistic. You show the right result showing up beneath the garbage. A lot of times now search shows nothing but garbage.

NoctisEqui ,
@NoctisEqui@mastodonapp.uk avatar

@bontchev

It’s awful!

raspberryswirl ,
adrian ,
@adrian@mastodon.design avatar

@bontchev the rot economy claims another victim

kshernandez ,
@kshernandez@me.dm avatar

@bontchev Where is the lie!!?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines