I really hope we get the last few expanse books as a movie trilogy with the TV series actors in like 5 years so the actors can age appropriately for the time gap accounting for anti aging meds. Maybe ignore TV series actual ending and recast certain actors so we can get some of the best parts of the last few books.
I don't think they really ended the TV show, I want to believe that they are leaving a gap of a few years like you said. It was unfortunate about the actor being a sleazy dickbag and needing to write his character out but gives us an opportunity to bring book characters that might not have been reasonable to have originally in the show but now could work because Alex is dead. I don't think a recast would work because of the chemistry and everyone having to fake the banter as if it is the exact same person meanwhile everyone watching has to ignore the dissonance of the new actor.
Everything is political. Political is the normal, natural, default state of being. You didn't answer my question, what's so special about this meme that it's apolitical?
The normal memes community got spammed with political stuff. This meme isn't specifically apolitical, but it isn't explicitly political either, that's why it's on here.
That's what the normal memes community is for. Political stuff. Everything is political. If you banned politics on those communities, they wouldn't have any memes at all. And I've never seen a nonpolitical meme on this community either.
the activities associated with the governance of a country or other area, especially the debate or conflict among individuals or parties having or hoping to achieve power.
And this meme is concerned with decision making in this particular household. A group of people are engaging in a dialogue regarding a decision: Should the man appreciate the woman's body every time he sees it? It's a decision they need to reach together, even if the decision is to agree to disagree. It's a microcosm of politics.
Reproduction is understood as the maintenance and continuation of existing social relations.
. In that application, it is used to explain the role of women in wider social and class structures, and their (often unrecognized) contribution to the capitalist economy via their (traditional) role within the household as both child-bearers and family caretakers, and by extension women's role as providers of free labor that is necessary to produce and maintain current and future workers.
Men wouldn't obsess over women's breasts if they weren't taught to by society, simple as. Plenty of cultures didn't have this phenomenon, and think that it is weird that people do that.
Pretty sure men and women are often attracted to boobs in cultures that fetishize boobs. There are some that don't. When you look at things from far enough back you start to notice that what you consider natural is not necessarily universal.
Definitely don't agree with your other posts here, but I actually agree with this statement. Many cultures don't have the same feelings about breasts that most of western society does.
I'm gonna start this with a statement. I don't agree with most everything the other individual is saying (the one claiming it's political and is getting downvoted, rightfully so).
I also totally agree boobs are awesome and both men and women (and everyone else in-between) like them. But why do we think they're so awesome? Most likely because they've been sexualized in our society.
I still don't think the op comic strip is political.
Edit: Ourtoothbrush or whatever, is the one I don't agree with, as per my initial statement.
If we were raised in a society where everyone was covered head to toe in figure-obscuring clothes, we'd probably be equally blown away by midriff or tight/short pants. And if we were raised in a nudist society, none of it would phase us.
From where I'm standing, it seems like a question of how much we want to desensitize ourselves to. There's certainly such a thing as too much and too little, so surely most people could agree that the line shouldn't be drawn at a nudist society, right? For me, boobs elicit the same level of response from my body as butts and genitals so the idea of boobs not being behind that line feels disconcerting.
I pretty much 100 % agree with what you're saying.
Breasts do seem to be an intimate enough part of the body to elicit such a response (and do for me as well), although only in women if we're going by "the norm" currently. I find them as such, but don't necessarily like the gender divide for a similar body part.
But anyways, I agree with what you're saying, feel the same way. But just can't really comprehend a different scenario due to being raised this way. It's even legal where I am for women to be topless, but it's rarely done.
I suppose I just wanted to comment on society as a whole.
Women have breasts because some prehistoric dudes decided they were good. It's literally biological. No other animal (or not many) has massive tiddies like humans. They're definitely the result of sexual selection.
Well, again, it is just a hypothesis. Also "happening for long enough" isn't necessarily how it works, for all you know it could have happened during a brief period and remained vestigial, assuming it even happened.
Being attracted to body parts is a fetish. I'm using a neutral definition of fetish, there is not an intended negative connotation. Research shows that the only thing that's like, universally a turn on for people regardless of cultural context is people having sex or masturbating.
This is totally incorrect. Do you have any sort of sources for this? I'd love to see one.
Many cultures even today don't "fetishize" breasts. If what you're saying is correct, that shouldn't be a thing.
I don't know the exact evolutionary advantage of human breasts, but surely due to the production of milk that is supportive of the best growth for babies. That's how natural selection works.
Also if your idea of "sexual selection" was correct, wouldn't every woman have massive tits? All giraffes have long necks, don't they?
It's true that it's not proven. What is true is that human breasts are weird and no one is sure why. The theory I most support is sexual selection because it looks like it'd be good for feeding babies
Many cultures even today don’t “fetishize” breasts
I didn't say fetishize. Sexual selection just means it ihas informed decisions to mate
surely due to the production of milk that is supportive of the best growth for babies
You'd think this but apparently it's not true. This is why I think it's a sexual selection thing. Some stone age dude probably thought the same thing
if your idea of “sexual selection” was correct, wouldn’t every woman have massive tits
Humans are the only animal that have big tiddies when they aren't nursing.
Sorry, I only used fetishizing because others were saying that. You did not say that. I sort of see what you're saying, but I'm still not on board. Is there any sort of references to support this?
The milk production thing isn't a thing? Maybe not breast size, but nipple size? Apparently that is a limiting factor for proper breast feeding (at least from what I've seen).
While humans are the only species (that I know of) who have the "big tiddys" (and goth GFs at that), if it was really a selective pressure, wouldn't the distribution of breast sizes be much smaller than it is?
I realize my first post was a bit aggressive (sorry, thought you hadn't thought out your opinion as well as you have, my fault), I'm not attacking your opinion, just curious.
It's more like, other animals don't have breasts at all when they aren't lactating. No specific sources to suggest it's sexual selection, I heard it somewhere. I like watching videos about archaeology but it's not my field. Breasts don't really fossilize, so don't think we'll ever know for sure. Idk about nipple size, but yeah too small isn't great.
To clarify, I'm not saying specifically large breasts were selected for but that the fact humans have breasts at all suggests it's at least a secondary sex charactaristic (like beards) and I don't think it benefits fitness in other ways
edit: Probably saying "big tiddies" was not the right way to put that
How do you figure people feeling and expressing attraction for their spouse has anything to do with gender roles...?
And why do you care so much that it's her chest specifically being admired? The comic's message would still stand if it were her butt or hips. And it'd still have nothing to do with politics.
Are you really getting offended on behalf of a fictional character? How do you know their relationship well enough to take offense on her behalf anyway?
Some waitstaff think the more they fill the thing, the less often you have to fill it. The 50 wasted napkins per customer should clue them in that this is not the case...
My local burger place actually has them, but I think it's a style choice. Like choosing a glass coke bottle instead of a can (although around here that's because it's "Mexican coca cola" which is significant better than regular coke, so maybe a bad example, haha).
In my experience this is fine, it's the ones who never stay in a role for more than two years you've got to watch out for. They seem to use each position as a temporary stepping stone on their career climb and rarely care about the team or the product!
External hire managers are the worst, they come in and have no idea how the company/product/department works (not their fault) so they tend to rely on sales-guru style tactics and rhetoric that just end up costing a bunch of time sucking each other off instead of, ya know, getting the job done.
Kneejerk reactions to the last kneejerk reaction, due to someone upending the status quo by being a good idea fairy and updating policy so as not to go by tribal knowledge. During the upheaval, it is revealed that the change was policy all along, but was disregarded for being inefficient. So instead of writing policy around the method that works, a square peg gets pushed through a round hole for the sake of leadership ego and trying to leave their mark.
I wonder how that would be handled. Like, do you need to have clear and obvious signage that a hungry mimic is on the premise, or does it fall under "They were doing a dumb thing, dumb things happen" in this case?
Cause I see "BEWARE: DANGEROUS MIMIC ON PREMISE", I'm not taking a single step over that property line. Whole damn yard could be a well-trained one.
I think I want that sign irl. Like the ones you see for dogs, but for mimics. Will it work? Of course not. If anything it might even attract D&D groups to play in my basement.
Non-Political Memes
Oldest