rbreich ,
@rbreich@masto.ai avatar

Clarence Thomas hearing Trump's immunity case, when his wife Ginni was directly involved in efforts to overturn the 2020 election, tells you everything you need to know about the Supreme Court's new code of "ethics."

It's a sham.

mr_jj_cakes ,
@mr_jj_cakes@toot.community avatar

@rbreich
Really needs a couple 100,000 people in the streets DC.

He still won't recuse but would clue in more people to how transparently corrupt he and the wife are.

tadbithuman ,

@rbreich

The whole edifice of rules and laws is a sham. The emperor is naked again, be it blue or red skinned.

kevinrns ,
@kevinrns@mstdn.social avatar

@rbreich

Shieleykim ,
@Shieleykim@mastodon.social avatar

@rbreich

shadowbottle ,
@shadowbottle@mastodon.social avatar

@rbreich @gedeonm *illegitimate Supreme Court

gumpfloyd ,
@gumpfloyd@mastodon.social avatar

@rbreich When it comes to greed and lusts for power there are no ethics.

Vonskinnback ,
@Vonskinnback@mastodon.social avatar

@rbreich but if trump gets immunity then Biden gets immediate immunity to do as he pleases, no matter what it is..

lin11c ,
@lin11c@toad.social avatar

@rbreich
We MUST remove at least 3 illegitimately installed justices. Investigate, indict, convict, remove. They are not above the law. We decide what happens, but we need a trifecta to do it!! Please VOTE BLUE everyone.

xs4me2 ,
@xs4me2@mastodon.social avatar

@rbreich
Bought and paid for…

JSharp1436 ,
@JSharp1436@mstdn.social avatar

@rbreich

A democracy?

Or a #US_Aristocracy?

I think the latter. Perhaps wealth inevitably produces aristocracies.

Kierkegaanks ,
@Kierkegaanks@beige.party avatar

@rbreich given no political friction, what would it take to change the law so that thomas can be dismissed for ethics violations?

steve_west ,
@steve_west@mastodon.social avatar

@rbreich @GottaLaff Dump already has immunity

JamesHD ,
@JamesHD@mastodon.social avatar

@rbreich

I would directly question with Republican tactics by saying exactly that..

"Mr Thomas, since your wife is guilty of being involved with tRump to illegally overturn the 2020 election, why do feel you do not need to recuse yourself from this case?"

Micritone45 ,
@Micritone45@toot.community avatar

@rbreich @rbreich There is nothing supreme about the Roberts court, you're correct its a sham.

oldmeanroy ,
@oldmeanroy@mas.to avatar

@rbreich I'd say nonexistent.

noplasticshower ,
@noplasticshower@zirk.us avatar

@rbreich the Supreme Court itself is a sham

GGMcBG ,
@GGMcBG@mstdn.plus avatar

@rbreich

People have been born and lived for decades and fucking died in the time that smirking predator of law and decency has been allowed to dictate the paths of our lives.

SNerd ,
@SNerd@lor.sh avatar

@rbreich
On the other hand if he recused himself, wouldn’t it appear to be an admission that his wife was involved? 🤷

SummerDay ,
@SummerDay@masto.nu avatar

@rbreich

Total agreement.

Starbrother ,
@Starbrother@universeodon.com avatar

@rbreich We are in serious danger.

BootsChantilly ,
@BootsChantilly@mstdn.social avatar

@rbreich The court itself is a sham.

mickymorse ,

@rbreich SCOTUS is a fraud, with maga members who conspired in insurrection.

dan131riley ,
@dan131riley@federate.social avatar

@rbreich "Appearance of corruption" and "corrupt intent" look to be the next victims in the SCOTUS campaign to define corruption so narrowly that it never applies

MylesRyden ,
@MylesRyden@vivaldi.net avatar

@rbreich

As the Germans found out, the courts are the last bastion of democracy.

We are totally screwed.

Thebratdragon ,
@Thebratdragon@mastodon.scot avatar

@rbreich Ethics, isn't that the name of a US Carrier?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines
    •