WhereGrapesMayRule ,

Do frat boys assault underaged girls?

ynazuma ,

There are corrupt traitors and liars in the SCOTUS. Insurrectionist sympathizers doesn’t seem like a stretch

I mean Justices Thomas and Alito would sell their first born for a jet ride to an island resort

JasonDJ ,

Or a real sweet RV.

Side note, as much of a piece of shit that Thomas is...his love of RVs is a bit endearing. Like watching a middle-aged autistic incel playing with his model trains. Except he's really smiling because he shit in your cereal, not because of the trains.

Red0ctober ,

Yes. Full stop. No question mark necessary

Hobbes_Dent ,

Why can’t I hold all these lemons this common sense?

MedicPigBabySaver ,
@MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world avatar

Duh. Majority of SCOTUS are a disgrace.

CatsGoMOW ,

Yes.

This is one of the only question headlines I can remember where the answer isn’t no.

Pistcow ,

Yes

dylanmorgan ,

Isn’t there a journalism rule about not having a headline be a question with a yes or no answer? Seems like there should be.

adamkempenich ,
@adamkempenich@lemmy.world avatar
FuglyDuck ,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

Guess there's always an exception, huh?

RedditWanderer ,

I wouldn't call it an exception (although there are always exceptions), the problem here lies in the word "sympathizers", it's too ambiguous. The answer is technically no, they're just conservatives who are technically not insurrectionist sympathizers. But they are.

FuglyDuck ,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

That’s some pretty convoluted reasoning, there.

I applaud the effort. But either they are or they aren’t.

Thomas is married to an insurrectionist, allito is flying symbols used by the insurrectionists.

And the other conservatives on the court are all ardently supporting Trump with half baked rulings buying increasing amounts of time to- they hope- delay the trial long enough for it to not matter.

I wouldn’t actually call them sympathizers- I’d just call them insurrectionists.

RedditWanderer , (edited )

Of course it's convoluted reasoning, I'm repeating what the conservatives believe? The effort does not come from me.

Let's not pretend they openly admit it was anything close to an insurrection, theyre just trying to "bring us back to Jesus". We all know what it was and what they are trying to do

masquenox ,

the problem here lies in the word “sympathizers”,

I'd say - the term enablers would be more apt.

masquenox ,

Isn’t there a journalism rule about not having a headline be a question with a yes or no answer?

To be fair, this seems more like a yes or really yes question.

0xD ,

...and why?

noxy ,
@noxy@yiffit.net avatar

yes

Laserpeen , (edited )

Duh?

njm1314 ,

You know usually they that for headlines with a question mark the answer at the end is always no. But I guess there's an exception to every rule huh?

someguy3 ,

This is what I never got about fascism until recently: It's the people in the system that bring it in.

Sabata11792 ,
@Sabata11792@kbin.social avatar

I mistook the headline for an Onion article.

cmbabul ,

It’s a break of the normal rule that any article title that poses a question can be answered with ‘no’

numbermess ,

Does the Pope shit in the woods?

Fedizen ,

Duh

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • politics@lemmy.world
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines