Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

Conyak , in Haley is more climate conscious than Trump—which isn't saying much | She admits warming is real, but is still all in on fossil fuels.

So even worse then? She knows it’s fucking up the environment she just doesn’t care.

ConditionOverload ,
@ConditionOverload@lemmy.world avatar

Trump probably also knows all this. But he won't ever admit it if it means losing votes or money.

silence7 OP Mod ,

I'd say that acknowledging the problem is the first step towards being willing to act, even if she hasn't gotten to that second part yet

TropicalDingdong , in Why billionaires should take the lead and declare their own emissions cutting targets

No. No volunteer bullshit.

First, Tax every dollar they make over a billion at 100%.

Second, mandated limits for all companies and products.

hex_m_hell ,
@hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net avatar

I think you misspelled "million"

TropicalDingdong ,

No. A billion is fine.

givesomefucks , in The big battle brewing over LNG exports | The Biden admin has presided over a vast buildout of liquefied methane gas infrastructure that threatens its climate goals. Here’s what could happen next.

When Biden brags about "the economy" a lot of that is due to record breaking fossil fuels drilling....

We're drilling more than when Trump was president

Which is bad for everyone except the billionaires that own those corporations.

Octospider , in Why billionaires should take the lead and declare their own emissions cutting targets

Billionaires are not leaders. They are takers. They must be forced via the law, otherwise they will do nothing besides further enrich themselves beyond their already obscene levels of wealth.

hex_m_hell ,
@hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net avatar

Billionaires somehow embody both the worst behaviors of toddlers and the worst behaviors of most adults, without having any of the redeeming qualities of either.

Skyrmir , in Young Republicans tried to focus GOP presidential contenders to act on climate change

The closest anyone got to getting republicans to do anything about the climate was when AoC introduced the Green New Deal. They lost their minds for a minute at being called out.

silence7 OP Mod ,

That's not quite true; it used to be possible to get an about-to-retire Republicans to endorse legislation. Francis Rooney endorsed carbon fee-and-dividend legislation back in 2019 (It did not pass)

CodeName , in Young Republicans tried to focus GOP presidential contenders to act on climate change

If you care about climate change you don't go to the Republicans for action. This would be like being a vegan and going to the local butchers shop and expecting them to sign your petition to ban meat.

Zaktor , in NYT Correspondent Nixes Eyebrow-Raising Climate Change Post

The New York Times has strict ethical guidelines that only permit advocacy for COVID, anti-wokism, and genocide.

Zaktor , in Young Republicans tried to focus GOP presidential contenders to act on climate change

To declare it a fake news hoax? Or were they confused about what "being a Republican" was?

Sterile_Technique , in Young Republicans tried to focus GOP presidential contenders to act on climate change
@Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world avatar

"Suicide cult members try to steer cult away from suicide."

I'd say something like "yeah let me know how that works out for you" but the climate they're destroying by supporting republicans is the same climate I live in, so I'll be burning right along with the little fuckers.

magnetosphere , in Peer who praised rising temperatures appointed to UK climate crisis committee | Labour says appointment of David Frost shows ‘wacky’ climate views no longer confined to Tory party fringes
@magnetosphere@kbin.social avatar

Since around the time Brexit was seriously proposed, UK politics have become almost as absurd as American politics.

Worx , in What If the Clean Energy Transition Costs Much Less Than We’ve Been Told? Talk about astronomical costs of a sustainable economy is leaving out some of the savings of using fewer fossil fuels

It literally doesn't matter. The financial cost is of no importance to sensible people - we know that the flooding of coastal cities, being unable to grow food, millions of climate refugees, etc. outweighs any short-term cost of slowing the climate crisis. On the other hand, the financial cost is the only thing of import to fossil fuel companies, because they are capitalists in a capitalist system - short-term profit is their priority every time.

Deebster ,
@Deebster@programming.dev avatar

The denier line has moved on from "it's not human caused" to "it's too late/expensive to do anything about it anyway", aiming for pessimism and doomerism to let them continue business as usual.

Having things like this we can counter with helps people argue and motivate to continue the fight.

assassinatedbyCIA , (edited ) in Why billionaires should take the lead and declare their own emissions cutting targets

I prefer the proletariat take the lead and start cutting a little off the top of the billionaires shoulders.

MajorHavoc ,

It's weird to me that billionaires are not actively campaigning to solve climate change.

I, personally, could happily die aged 87, on a clean planet, surrounded by family, on a small expensive boat.

Rather than at 67, on a mega yacht, in a toxic wasteland, surrounded by the bodies of dead body-guards.

It doesn't seem like a really challenging choice, to me.

It's not rocket science to see where this trend line leads. We should all cooperate to fix this shit, now, using laws and science.

wanderingmeomeo ,

Eh, they don't care precisely because they believe they have the privilege to shield themselves, and their descendants from environmental catastrophe. Luxurious fallout bulkers are built right now to do just that: protect themselves and their children from iminent threats, be it mob riots or tsunami or nuclear fallout. They don't give a shit about the rest of us, and why would they? What do they have to gain from caring about us, it's just not in their interest to do that when they could afford to survive through this and we don't. They've already won the logic of the free market in a bloodthirsty, capital-centric world then surely they earned their superiority, and their place as the true, deserving heirs of the Earth reborn. Looking through their eyes, it's just natural selection.

lntl , in A ‘Revolutionary’ Way to Feed the World That’s Very Old | The U.S. global food security envoy is pushing to bring back traditional African crops that American policies helped to sideline.

Why can't Africa just eat corn like the rest of us?

silence7 OP Mod ,

We mostly don't eat it; the US corn crop largely goes to feeding animals and getting burned in cars.

lntl , (edited )

no human corn consumption?? this country is going to hell

silence7 OP Mod ,

Very little.

https://slrpnk.net/pictrs/image/c0057de7-d725-490b-a8aa-9ab9a559ba87.webp

People actually eating it is part of that little "other" bar.

Nyssa , in A ‘Revolutionary’ Way to Feed the World That’s Very Old | The U.S. global food security envoy is pushing to bring back traditional African crops that American policies helped to sideline.

I definitely recommend looking into some of Dr. Fowlers history, he's such a cool person and his work with Crop Trust was so cool.

Mojojojo1993 , in A climate-friendly hamburger? A carbon-neutral glass of milk? Companies make bold claims not backed by science

Bold claims = lies. They are telling explicit lies

Charge em

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • climate@slrpnk.net
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines