As Russia Advances, NATO Considers Sending Trainers Into Ukraine ( www.nytimes.com )

NATO allies are inching closer to sending troops into Ukraine to train Ukrainian forces, a move that would be another blurring of a previous red line and could draw the United States and Europe more directly into the war.

Ukraine’s manpower shortage has reached a critical point, and its position on the battlefield in recent weeks has seriously worsened as Russia has accelerated its advances to take advantage of delays in shipments of American weapons. As a result, Ukrainian officials have asked their American and NATO counterparts to help train 150,000 new recruits closer to the front line for faster deployment.

So far the United States has said no, but Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr., the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said on Thursday that a NATO deployment of trainers appeared inevitable. “We’ll get there eventually, over time,” he said.

MBFC
Archive

AverageLemmmmmmytor ,
rayyy ,

Putin is making his move. Russia is breaking a treaty, invading a sovereign country and trying to destabilize several countries through psyops. Those sitting on the fence will wind up under his boot.

GBU_28 ,

About a year overdue

Amoxtli ,

Sure, NATO advisors will be training 60-year-old Ukrainians to fight. They need the draft age to go down to 14 years old.

ID411 ,

NATO has been training Ukraine troops, in country, since at least 2015.

I don’t know what the fuck this is about

breakfastmtn OP ,
@breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca avatar

They haven't been training Ukrainian troops in-country since the start of the full-scale invasion. The US in particular pulled all their troops out about 10 days before Russia invaded.

ghostdoggtv ,

Red line is funny. We signed the Budapest accords back in the 80s. We are just in denial about it.

CTDummy ,

Care to elaborate? Who is violating the Budapest accords memorandum in your view?

bassomitron ,

That would be Russia, is my guess:

The memoranda, signed in Patria Hall at the Budapest Convention Center with US Ambassador Donald M. Blinken amongst others in attendance, prohibited Russia, the United States and the United Kingdom from threatening or using military force or economic coercion against Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan, "except in self-defence or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations." As a result of other agreements and the memorandum, between 1993 and 1996, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine gave up their nuclear weapons.

BaroqueInMind ,

The accords simply allowed the actions of sanctions as response to violations. It was a useless document with toothless consequences.

CTDummy ,

The reason I ask is it’s common Russian disinformation to claim US or NATO violated this agreement; justifying the Russian federations invasion of Ukraine.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • world@lemmy.world
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines