Catvalente ,
@Catvalente@wandering.shop avatar

I just had a realization.

It was (and is) always so confusing when The Bad Straights claimed “gay people getting married will ruin the institution for everyone.”

But I think they always meant that if two men or two women can get married, then marriage must not be defined by a man obtaining a woman as servant/property & securing exclusive rights to her labor, identity, & body.

And without that, they can’t even imagine what purpose marriage could ever serve.

Npars01 ,
@Npars01@mstdn.social avatar

@Catvalente

Everything Republicans support is about:

  1. Getting and keeping cheap labor
  2. Preserving unfair & unsustainable social hierarchies
  3. Maintaining white supremacy
  4. Making the already rich, even richer
  5. Imposing religious dogma on non-evangelicals
  6. Bolstering the fossil fuel industry that's frying a planet & undermining democracies
  7. Tax evasion
  8. Converting government into a grift where taxpayers pay, without taxpayers benefitting or having a say in policy.
philip_cardella ,
@philip_cardella@historians.social avatar

[Thread, post or comment was deleted by the author]

  • Loading...
  • apophis ,
    @apophis@brain.worm.pink avatar

    @philip_cardella @Npars01 @Catvalente it all makes so much sense when you look at the history and frame it in terms of a society that's fed itself by maintaining one of the most brutal and massive slave-holding institutions the world had ever seen, and has had its laws and culture and understanding of right and wrong shaped by being in that position for multiple centuries, suddenly losing the de jure element of that structure and spending the next 150+ years scrambling with everything they've got, by any deception or stochastic violence or blasphemous heresy necessary, to put the substance of everything back into the only social, economic and moral order that they can conceive of for organizing a society

    KeithAmmann ,
    @KeithAmmann@dice.camp avatar

    @Catvalente @abucci summed it up in a pithy formulation that's stuck with me: "A man can't own a man, and property can't own property."

    Catvalente OP ,
    @Catvalente@wandering.shop avatar
    JulieB ,
    @JulieB@deacon.social avatar

    @Catvalente @KeithAmmann @abucci

    "I concur on the oof." said the escaped property. 🤦‍♀️

    KeithAmmann ,
    @KeithAmmann@dice.camp avatar

    @JulieB @Catvalente @abucci I would like to clarify, in case it isn't sufficiently clear to begin with, that this was a position he was characterizing, not one he endorsed.

    JulieB ,
    @JulieB@deacon.social avatar

    @KeithAmmann @Catvalente @abucci Absolutely. Never thought for a minute that he endorsed it. He just defined the hell out of it!

    CassandraZeroCovid ,
    @CassandraZeroCovid@mastodon.social avatar

    @KeithAmmann @Catvalente @abucci

    This.

    The whole line of thinking never made sense - unless you view it through this lens.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines