This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. For a complete list of posts, browse on the original instance.
I am aware that this is one of those things that is so radically out of step with the media narrative that people will come in my comments and say "lol pure copium" "what on earth are you smoking to say something so wrong" "what you are DELUDED how can you even say something that is so RADICALLY DIFFERENT from what the New York...
Whatever else happens in the coming days with the presidential election, the whole saga will permanently affect my understanding of the culture of The New York Times.
I literally just today learned that the "Biden is destroying the climate, we emitted more greenhouse gas than ever before in 2023" talking point isn't even "not the whole story" -- it's actually the complete opposite of what actually happened....
This BTW is how you involve in the story the reality of what the voters think, which is an important portion of election coverage, while still upholding your basic journalistic responsibility to communicate to people what's actually going on.
Why I’m skeptical of some puzzling polls
Credit to @GottaLaff
