Resol ,
@Resol@lemmy.world avatar

It's simple: I don't.

Presi300 ,
@Presi300@lemmy.world avatar

I mean, if asking to help with code/poorly explained JS libraries counts then... Pretty much every day. Other than that... very rarely.

KestrelAlex ,

I've never tried to have what I would call a conversation, but I use it as a tool for both fixing/improving writing and for writing basic scripts in autohotkey, which it's fairly good at.

It's language models are good for removing the emotional work from customer service - either giving bad news in a very detached professional way or being polite and professional when what I want is to call someone a fartknocker.

ArmokGoB ,

Once every few months

intensely_human ,

Once or twice a week

ChefTyler1980 ,

Never

OutrageousUmpire ,

Multiple times throughout the day. I co-work on personal projects with several different LLMs. Primarily Claude, but also GPT-4o and Llama 70b.

Bishma ,
@Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

The closest I come to chatting is asking github co-pilot to explain syntax when I'm learning a new language. I just needed to contribute a class library to an existing C# API, hadn't done OOP in 15 years, and had never touched dotNet.

gedaliyah ,
@gedaliyah@lemmy.world avatar

Maybe 3-4 times a year. Can't see using it more than that at this point.

cheddar ,
@cheddar@programming.dev avatar

I ask additional questions or provide information from my side to get a better answer, but I'm still doing this to solve a problem or gather knowledge. I guess that counts as a conversation, but not a casual one.

winkerjadams ,

Never

shinigamiookamiryuu ,

I forgot how the conversation went, but one day, a conversation I had with someone about comprehensibility (which was often an issue) compelled me to talk to an AI, a talk which I remember from the fact the AI did now have such issues as the complaining humans had.

intensely_human ,

Yeah I’ve run into this a bit. People say it “doesn’t understand” things, but when I ask for a definition of “understand” I usually just get downvotes.

HornyOnMain ,

Not as much as I did at the beginning, but I mainly chalk that up to learning more about its limitations and getting better at detecting its bullshit. I no longer go to it for designing because it doesn't do it well at the scale i need. Now it's mainly used to refractor already working code, to remember what a kind of feature is called, and to catch random bugs that usually end up being typos that are hard to see visually. Past that, i only use it for code generation a line at a time with copilot, or sometimes a function at a time if the function is super simple but tedious to type, and even then i only accept the suggestion that i was already thinking of typing.

Basically it's become fancy autocomplete, but that's still saved me a tremendous amount of time.

subspaceinterferents ,
@subspaceinterferents@lemmy.world avatar

Daily.

Alice ,
@Alice@hilariouschaos.com avatar

💯

notnotmike ,
@notnotmike@programming.dev avatar

Conversations as in a back and forth? Never. Not much of a point to it.

Asking questions about topics? On occasion. I find myself distrustful of hallucinations so I usually use it as a jumping off point.

Asking about bugs and documentation? Once a day at least

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • asklemmy@lemmy.world
  • random
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines