fine_sandy_bottom ,

Australia checking in.

For the last 2 years we're suddenly awash with these cheap Chinese cars, and yank tanks.

They're both ridiculous in their own way. I can't see myself buying either in the next decade.

The Chinese stuff is only selling because its cheaper, but it's going to cost a lot more to own because it's going to lose value much more quickly than real cars. As usual, you pay more for cheaper products.

That said, I don't mind them being here and putting some downward pressure on the price of proper cars.

Commence downvotes butthurt tankies.

archomrade ,

Commence downvotes butthurt tankies.

I'm honestly confused about who the tankies are supposed to be at this point. Downvotes for what?

yogthos ,
@yogthos@lemmy.ml avatar

because US can't compete with China

IgnatiusJReilly ,

Biden has to lead an increase in charging infrastructure. By the time that was underway (and automakers made some realistic affordable EVs) I think things would change.

And trucks with clean diesel genny powered plug-in Hybrids.

filister ,

Prove me wrong that this has nothing to do with the fact that China became the world's biggest auto exporter last year and this is a desperate way for the US to try to protect their own auto industry.

Free market, my bottom.

SendMePhotos ,

FREE* MARKET!

*=within the US

hglman ,

Lol no, that hasnt been true for a long time.

SendMePhotos ,
  • = within the US**

** = if you're born into money

jaschen ,

Well, it's more than that. China is actively trying to dump on the market. Selling things at a loss so they can kill and steal market share.

Sorta what Amazon did early on but on a global scale.

filister ,

You do realise that you have described just now what all startups are doing in the US. Like look at WhatsApp, Facebook, etc. they were working for years if not decades on a massive loss in an attempt to more or less monopolize the segment, backed by the deep pockets of their investors.

And I think it is only fair if you demand the same level of scrutiny to all companies involved in such practices.

jaschen ,

American companies can't dump. This is specifically for countries to protect their own industries.

US companies can operate at a loss to gain market share, but the money losses is still in its own economy and not an outside foreign country that might not aligned with our countries values.

Plus a company can only lose money for so long that eventually the market starts correcting itself and investors pull funding. Can't be said about China which is basically unlimited money.

The repercussions is drastic. China has already done this with solar panels. We are already beholden to them for this. If we were dependant on solar panels and not fossil fuel, they would literally be controlling our energy needs.

filister ,

And the US has done this with so many industries, which you are trying to monopolize or control.

And apparently you are okay when your own country is doing this but not okay when other countries are doing it.

Does this seem fair to you, because sure as hell doesn't seem to me.

jaschen ,

It's not about fair. Anti dumping tariffs is designed to protect national security and national industries. We are not exclusive to this. China themselves does the same exact thing.

MarcoPOLO ,

This would be valid if... China was dumping. They're not. They're selling far above unit costs. In fact, their export models are often double or triple the price of domestic models of the same car.

jaschen ,
LittleBorat2 ,

It's obviously protectionist who said otherwise?
Let China sell their cars to friendly nations, oh wait...

thorbot ,

Because China bad, obviously

mlg ,
@mlg@lemmy.world avatar

I made it too late to this thread and now all the top comments are corporate shill posts for the big 3 American OEMs who already outsourced the hell out of their production lines meaning none of their points about protection or votes has been valid for at least 15 years.

Even if Mexico magically invented their own cheap EV, you better bet the USA will have that blocked or at the very least smacked with a huge tariff for no reason beyond protecting some megacorp profits.

They already lobbied for all these stupid rules against JDM back when Japan proved it could make superior cars for cheap. Then, it took them decades to enter the US market locally by building factories and whatnot.

Biden is blocking because China bad and muh lobbyist profits, not because there's an actual issue of safety or security.

filister ,

Same with Huawei, they blocked their phones and telecommunication equipment and never managed to show any proof that the Chinese government is actually snooping on their equipment.

And it is not like the US doesn't have a proven track record of pushing American suppliers to put backdoors and pretty much doing exactly what they accused Huawei and indirectly China of doing.

alcoholicorn ,

Every accusation a confession.

They accuse China of doing it because it's what they are or would do.

TheAnonymouseJoker ,

They most likely banned Huawei because they refused to deploy NSA backdoors, and have no backdoors to begin with.

cobra89 ,

Yes Trump imposed the tariff but since Biden didn't cancel it he gets the title of the article. What 🤡 shit.

Also as another commenter pointed out, these vehicles would never pass NHTSA standards anyway.

alcoholicorn ,

Correct, the person who has the power to change this right now gets in the title, because they have the power to change this right now and choose not to.

Same with every policy Bush/Obama/Trump admins implemented yet Biden maintains, from torture facilities in foreign countries to blowing up children in Yemen to increased restrictions of Cuba.

turkishdelight ,

Because GenocideJoe is a sore loser.

catfish ,

They title is reserved for Zionist genocidal maniacs like bibi

Linkerbaan ,
@Linkerbaan@lemmy.world avatar

America numba one!

In oil production

yogthos ,
@yogthos@lemmy.ml avatar
PanArab ,

Racism and chauvinism with corruption and cronyism mixed in

newnton ,

Almost like that’s part of how he won over the UAW and that Chinese EVs are a threat to US industry and our own migration on the industrial side from petrochemical to electric based manufacturing and infrastructure. I’m not saying that i agree with everything Biden has done in this space, but this is much more complex than Biden saying “I like the environment but hate China” and this article seems to oversimplify a bit.

Also it’s not like Chinese vehicles are banned, the Volvo EX30 is starting sales soon at 35000$, which is extremely cost competitive with current options in the US market despite being affected by the tariffs and not benefiting from US subsidies.

Here’s an article I read yesterday arguing the opposite side and pushing for even more stringent bans on Chinese EVs https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/27/opinion/gm-ford-electric-vehicles.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

ExfilBravo ,

If people want something they should be able to have it. If they are good enough for the EU they are good enough for the US.

Ghostalmedia ,
@Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world avatar

The EU also protects its manufacturers by taxing Chinese cars, but the tariffs isn’t nearly as punishing as America’s.

I’d love for the US to start by cutting the tariff to something more reasonable.

Habahnow ,

So reasons include: politics (Lots of swing voters work in the auto manufacturing industry that would get pissed with an influx of chinese cars), national security (worries of the type of information Chinese cars would send back home), and lastly industry protectionism.

As much as this sucks, I kind of agree. We really don't want to rely on China until they prove to reliably not want to screw us. If this was Taiwan, Mexico, any country from the EU, etc. I would definitely want their cheap EVs to hit our market and bloody up the american manufacturers.

IrateAnteater ,

To add to the national security angle: the auto industry is one of the industries that would be able to pivot to wartime production the fastest (as seen in the world wars). Probably not the first thing on everyone's mind, but I'd bet it's at least part of the consideration.

regul ,

Killing the planet so you can be ready for war.

God bless America.

eltrain123 ,

To add a bit more to the national security angle: with the potential to escalate into open warfare with China, due to tensions between Taiwan and China, we really don’t want millions of drivable computers sending harvested metadata about our road systems and behavior patterns directly to enemy leadership.

givesomefucks ,

What?

We make about 150,000 vehicles a month in America...

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DAUPSA

We sell about 150,000,000

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/TOTALSA

If Biden if fucking over every other American to "protect" a few thousands jobs....

That's a bad choice.

For damn near everyone except the executives of companies who make most of their vehicles in Mexico anyways.

Like, if Biden is doing this to protect jobs, it's protecting jobs that went to Mexico decades ago.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/889529/mexico-automotive-production-volume/

Not_mikey ,

This isn't a few thousand jobs, auto manufacturing in the u.s. employs millions and millions more work in services or industries dependent on it.

Also union auto jobs keep wages high for other unskilled labor as it puts upward pressure on employers as they compete for workers, eg. Amazon may have to increase wages to compete with a unionized auto plant that got a raise with the recent negotiation, otherwise people might choose to work there. If that auto plant goes under though, or moves over to China, then there's a surplus of workers who need a job so amazon can lower wages cause they know they're desperate, this is how the middle class collapses.

Globalization encourages a race to the bottom for wages which hurts workers. That's why free trade deals like NAFTA/USMCA will have minimum wages put on auto manufacturing, and why it's better for cars to be manufactured in Mexico then in China, where no such minimum wage exists. Chinese cars aren't cheaper because their manufacturers are more efficient, its because their workers are more exploited.

We do need to transition away from gas cars, ideally to public transit, but absent that we can encourage EV adoption with subsidies and discourage gas car purchases with taxes without destroying the middle class.

givesomefucks ,

This isn’t a few thousand jobs, auto manufacturing in the u.s. employs millions and millions more work in services or industries dependent on it.

So why dont we have tarrifs on the ones that are produced in Mexico too?

That's the problem with "moderates" you can't argue with consistent logic.

You have to fliflop back and forth and sometimes argue the exact opposite.

If this is to protect US jobs, and that's a good thing, why don't every foreign country have tariffs? Why let American corporations send the jobs to Mexico?

IrateAnteater ,

Have a look at that NAFTA replacement agreement. There's provisions in there specifically to put upwards pressure on Mexican wages.

IamSparticles ,

Just a small correction: The sales numbers are 15 million, not 150 million.

BudgetBandit ,

Ah yes, any country from the EU. Like the made in Balkan vehicles with those adidas stripes 👌

umbrella ,
@umbrella@lemmy.ml avatar

i like how the US imposed the free market onto everyone else, bit now they are closing theirs for protectionism

Habahnow ,

Well china is completely anti free market.so I'm actually surprised more countries aren't charging more tarrifs on them.
Also, I don't think most major countries are completely protectionist free.

umbrella ,
@umbrella@lemmy.ml avatar

china is being sanctioned to hell because of that, war with them is being discussed by republicans over this.

any country that is does, and most cant survive it.

china is the exception because they are big enough to survive it.

fine_sandy_bottom ,

Almost like the US are acting in their own interests.

TheAnonymouseJoker ,

and lastly industry protectionism.

Toshiba, Alstom, ZTE, Huawei and Tiktok disagreed in unison.

Crikeste ,

Because he’s a sinophobic little bitch 😤

Ghostalmedia ,
@Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world avatar

I think the new Chinese made Volvo is one of the more interesting cars coming out this year. It’s $35k… AFTER the 27.5% tariff on Chinese made cars. Meaning, Volvo is actually selling this for $27k. The car is super minimal inside, but manufacturing in China is clearly allowing them to reduce costs a shit load.

US auto manufacturing would be so screwed if these things could be sold without the tariff.

Edit: also worth noting, they’re going to be leasing these direct in many states. No dealer markup.

MonsiuerPatEBrown ,

US Auto manufacturers have screwed themselves and the US public with their current production values.

Happened int he 1970s, and Honda and Toyota ran wild. Unfortunately US automakers are more important, it seems, than those that bought their cars.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • worldnews@lemmy.ml
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines