Most people like seafood. But if they knew about the huge environmental cost in obtaining their servings of shrimp, scallops, cod, or sole, they might not enjoy it so much...
More than a quarter of the wild seafood that the world eats comes from the seafloor, scooped up in huge nets. These nets, called bottom trawls, catch millions of tons of fish worth billions of dollars each year. But they also damage coral, sponges, starfish, worms, and other sand-dwellers as the nets scrape against the ocean bed. Environmentalists sometimes liken the practice to strip-mining or clear-cutting forests.
According to a new study in the journal Frontiers in Marine Science, bottom trawling may be even worse than many people thought. Dragging nets through the sand isn’t just a threat to marine life. The study found that stirring up carbon-rich sediment on the seafloor releases some 370 million metric tons of planet-warming carbon dioxide every year, roughly the same as running 100 coal-fired power plants.
“I was pretty surprised,” said Trisha Atwood, a watershed scientist at Utah State University and the paper’s lead author. The findings, Atwood added, suggest that restricting bottom trawling could have “almost instantaneous benefits” for the climate.
The paper follows a study by some of the same scientists published in the journal Nature in 2021 – one that drew a lot of media attention as well as criticism from other researchers who thought its results were way off. In 2021, Atwood’s team found that bottom trawling unlocks more carbon from the seafloor than all of the world’s airplanes emit each year. But they couldn’t say how much of that carbon ended up in the atmosphere heating the earth and how much of it stayed in the water.
So that’s what they set out to do in the latest study. The team used fishing vessel data to map regions where trawlers have disturbed the seabed — like the North Sea off the coast of Europe — and applied ocean circulation models to estimate how much carbon dioxide flows from the sea into the air. They found that more than half of the carbon set loose by trawling makes its way into the atmosphere — and does so relatively quickly, within less than a decade.
“The most important finding here is that these emissions are not negligible,” said Juan Mayorgas, a marine data scientist at the National Geographic Society and co-author of the paper. “They are not small. They cannot be ignored.”
The world’s oceans are sponge-like in their ability to absorb carbon, soaking up a quarter of all the carbon dioxide that humans spew into the air. In fact, a lot more carbon is stored in the sea than in all the soil and plants on Earth. But until recently, little attention had been given to how much the oceans emit. “We know the oceans aren’t a closed system,” Mayorgas said. “At the same time the ocean is absorbing CO2, it’s emitting it.”
Most climate goals and policies don’t take emissions from sea-based activities like trawling into account. Atwood and Mayorgas said their study could help change that. “Now,” Mayorgas said, “countries can put all the information on the table and say, ‘Here’s how many jobs trawling produces, here’s how much food it produces, here’s how much carbon it’s emitting.'”
@breadandcircuses Since 2009 I've been involved with the Community of Arran Seabed Trust; as a volunteer, committee member, trustee and for a few years, chair. The effort involved in trying to get the Scottish Government to see the harm that has been done to Scotland’s seas over the last 150 years or so is unbelievable; and ScotGov still support the mobile sector - bottom trawlers & scallop dredgers - at the expense of other, more sustainable fisheries.
@RussCheshire@breadandcircuses
I don't support dredging or drag nets but the stats about the way fish farms are run don't lie either.
They pose a significant environmental problem to the ecology of the waters they are operating in.
Nitrogen and bacteria become super concentrated in the areas these floating farms run in, it potentially produces more waste than all the humans producing bio-waste on a continent the size of norway in a year. That also creates a critical imbalance too.
@breadandcircuses Bottom trawling has been a problem for over 600 years. In 1376 a petition to prohibit it was presented to British parliament. In 1583 two fishermen were executed for using chains on their beam trawls. We've known the destruction for centuries, yet now with diesel engines, sonar, & drones we pillage on steroids.
When will we ever learn.
Chile has banned bottom trawling along its (very long) coast, and fishers are doing better.
" Chilean fishers, and the coastal communities they call home, now benefit from the fact that 23% of the country’s waters are protected in zones where fishing and other commercial activities are restricted."
@breadandcircuses@wellingtonrock The Monterey Bay Aquarium has a list of sustainable seafood, and they put it in an app. But it’s a matter of whether you trust the bodies evaluating fishing practices for “sustainability” or not: some are problematic.
@breadandcircuses
When I was three, I learned to connect the fish in the tank with the fish on the plate, and I haven't intentionally eaten seafood since. When I was young, if someone asked whether I liked fish, I used to say "I like fish, that's why I don't eat them."
In a related tangent, you might be interested in PBS NewsHour coverage last night of forced labor in Chinese seafood processing, the products of which are sometimes consumed in the US: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhnZQ0OjcIo
@breadandcircuses I'm glad some real science has been done. Thomas Huxley co-wrote the report of the Royal Commission on Sea Fishing in 1866. It claimed trawlers were harmless, dismissed Scotland's fishermen concerns about how boom trawlers were damaging the sea bed. Basically, by refusing all evidence from local fishermen, only listening to big trawler owners. The harms were clear to all by 1883, but scientific establishment continued to deny there was a problem. So not a new problem.
@breadandcircuses My grandfather and before him were fisherman.
I still remember how he hated where the industry was going with the factory ships, and it's only gone way much worse after his death.
@breadandcircuses How true! The former "healthy" food has become a dangerous food: poisoned and endangered by extinction through "modern" fishing têchniques. Its a loss.