stilgherrian , 2 months ago “A world-first study has found that when asked a health-related question, the more evidence given to ChatGPT the less reliable it becomes -- reducing the accuracy of its responses to as low as 28 per cent.” https://www.csiro.au/en/news/All/News/2024/April/Good-evidence-confuses-ChatGPT-when-used-for-health-information
“A world-first study has found that when asked a health-related question, the more evidence given to ChatGPT the less reliable it becomes -- reducing the accuracy of its responses to as low as 28 per cent.” https://www.csiro.au/en/news/All/News/2024/April/Good-evidence-confuses-ChatGPT-when-used-for-health-information
vampiress , 2 months ago @stilgherrian Excited to learn my drunken guesses are better than chatGPT.
@stilgherrian Excited to learn my drunken guesses are better than chatGPT.
stilgherrian OP , 2 months ago @vampiress But for how long?
@vampiress But for how long?
vampiress , 2 months ago @stilgherrian Given how chatGPT is "progressing"... I'd say its accuracy will drop rather than rise.
@stilgherrian Given how chatGPT is "progressing"... I'd say its accuracy will drop rather than rise.
NewtonMark , 2 months ago @vampiress @stilgherrian Seems pretty obvious that ChatGPT has passed the peak of its hype cycle. Sora is OpenAI trying to convince its audience that they aren't a one trick pony (they're a one trick pony)
@vampiress @stilgherrian Seems pretty obvious that ChatGPT has passed the peak of its hype cycle. Sora is OpenAI trying to convince its audience that they aren't a one trick pony (they're a one trick pony)