Reposting this toot myself because the original didn't include alt text, and I love these kinds of comparisons. Also added some hashtags and placed a period after the @ sign in the response as to not bother the original receiver of the reply with a post they've already read.
"@.vampiress people always forget that on actual CRTs there's LOADS of effective subpixels with the phosphors, so the output of 320x200 is essentially a WAY higher resolution being smoothed with blending. Even better CRT pixel art generally takes into account how the phosphors cause this effect visually and use it to pack WAY more detail into low resolutions than is possible at the same resolution with square LCD pixels! It's crazy in 2024 upscale hardware still doesn't translate it properly"