rahmstorf , German
@rahmstorf@fediscience.org avatar

The cost of achieving a 90% clean grid using today’s technology is approximately zero.
And this excludes the external costs of fossil fuels: climate impacts, air pollution, geopolitical instability.
https://www.theclimatebrink.com/p/is-renewable-energy-cheaper-than?utm_source=cbnewsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=2024-03-12&utm_campaign=Daily+Briefing+12+03+2024

anakin78z ,
@anakin78z@mograph.social avatar

@rahmstorf Pardon my whatever, but isn't this just pointless distraction?
"A lot of my disagreement with the other guest revolved around a particular question: Is renewable energy (RE) cheaper than fossil fuels?"

Is eating lead cheaper than eating vegetables? Scientists say no, but let's dig in deeper and assemble a panel of people with opinions to dig into this important issue.

KevinMarks ,
@KevinMarks@xoxo.zone avatar

@rahmstorf this seems to ignore storage options, especially well understood ones like pumped hydropower. If you reframe the wind/solar excess as intermittent abundance, then using it for desalination and aquifer restoration fits in very well with dispatchable hydropower

Nigel_Purchase ,
@Nigel_Purchase@mstdn.social avatar

@rahmstorf

Enlightening analysis

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines