lowqualityfacts , 3 months ago Clearly. https://patreon.com/lowqualityfacts
Clearly. https://patreon.com/lowqualityfacts
alper , 2 months ago @lowqualityfacts "what you see is all there is"
@lowqualityfacts "what you see is all there is"
seismic007 , 2 months ago @lowqualityfacts considering the exponent for a number cubed is ‘3,’ this is not such a L. Q. fact.
@lowqualityfacts considering the exponent for a number cubed is ‘3,’ this is not such a L. Q. fact.
demofox , 2 months ago @lowqualityfacts inside, outside, and in the sides
@lowqualityfacts inside, outside, and in the sides
JosephMeyer , 2 months ago @lowqualityfacts And 1.44224957031 cubed equals 3 is the mathematical proof?
@lowqualityfacts And 1.44224957031 cubed equals 3 is the mathematical proof?
MaierAmsden , 2 months ago @lowqualityfacts Plus a top and bottom and back
@lowqualityfacts Plus a top and bottom and back
christopherbrown , 2 months ago @lowqualityfacts Actually a high quality fact.
@lowqualityfacts Actually a high quality fact.
indigoparadox , 2 months ago @lowqualityfacts I counted two but then I realized the bottom is a side, as well.
@lowqualityfacts I counted two but then I realized the bottom is a side, as well.
jmax , 2 months ago @lowqualityfacts The other sides are actually spares.
@lowqualityfacts The other sides are actually spares.
wilpercy , 3 months ago @lowqualityfacts like everybody else Cubans are multifaceted.
@lowqualityfacts like everybody else Cubans are multifaceted.
JeremyMallin , 3 months ago @lowqualityfacts It only has two: the inside and the outside.
@lowqualityfacts It only has two: the inside and the outside.
MediaBaron , 3 months ago @lowqualityfacts An ice cube begs to differ.
@lowqualityfacts An ice cube begs to differ.
ev_rider_j , 3 months ago @lowqualityfacts Why do you think they call it “3-D” and not “6-D”? Q.E.D.!
@lowqualityfacts Why do you think they call it “3-D” and not “6-D”? Q.E.D.!
gdinwiddie , 3 months ago @lowqualityfacts As you can see in this picture:
@lowqualityfacts As you can see in this picture:
JoeBeam , 3 months ago @lowqualityfacts Maybe in your dimension, but here in . . .
@lowqualityfacts Maybe in your dimension, but here in . . .
jstritch , 3 months ago @lowqualityfacts My geometry teacher ran out of the room screaming when I said that.
@lowqualityfacts My geometry teacher ran out of the room screaming when I said that.
0x575446 , 3 months ago @lowqualityfacts It's only 2. I don't care what anyone else says, but macaroni and cheese is NOT a side.
@lowqualityfacts It's only 2. I don't care what anyone else says, but macaroni and cheese is NOT a side.
Ebly , 3 months ago @lowqualityfacts front, back and in?
@lowqualityfacts front, back and in?
Alias001 , 3 months ago @lowqualityfacts What if a mirror was behind said cube? At the right angle ... No pun intended so let's say from certain perspectives one could observe all six sides.
@lowqualityfacts What if a mirror was behind said cube? At the right angle ... No pun intended so let's say from certain perspectives one could observe all six sides.
petealexharris , 3 months ago @lowqualityfacts Any cube you look at will have no more than three sides. Now you might turn it round to reveal other sides, but that proves nothing. A cube only has 3 sides at any given time.
@lowqualityfacts
Any cube you look at will have no more than three sides. Now you might turn it round to reveal other sides, but that proves nothing.
A cube only has 3 sides at any given time.
Xucaen , 3 months ago @lowqualityfacts A cube has six sides. 🤔 Is this a punchline for a joke?
A cube has six sides. 🤔 Is this a punchline for a joke?
chrishuck , 3 months ago @lowqualityfacts You can only ever see three sides of a cube at any time so 🤔
@lowqualityfacts You can only ever see three sides of a cube at any time so 🤔
odessa , 3 months ago @lowqualityfacts SIR...
@lowqualityfacts SIR...
wesmason , 3 months ago @lowqualityfacts Inside, outside, and the middle.
Inside, outside, and the middle.
wokstation , 3 months ago @lowqualityfacts and three others! You were technically correct, which is the best kind of correct. A worryingly high quality fact, you OK?
@lowqualityfacts and three others! You were technically correct, which is the best kind of correct.
A worryingly high quality fact, you OK?