Npars01 , 4 days ago (edited 4 days ago) @junesim63 Some utility company failed to make their payments to a corrupt Supreme Court Justice or Tory apparatchik. They'll likely rectify that upon appeal. It's unlikely this ruling arose from civic minded law, because six Supreme Court Justices are indifferent to sewage contamination of the water supply. Ditto a Tory parliament.
@junesim63
Some utility company failed to make their payments to a corrupt Supreme Court Justice or Tory apparatchik.
They'll likely rectify that upon appeal.
It's unlikely this ruling arose from civic minded law, because six Supreme Court Justices are indifferent to sewage contamination of the water supply.
Ditto a Tory parliament.
Npars01