masquenox ,

If a fascist dictatorship in the US is "inevitable," it's only so because liberals won't actually lift a finger to stop it.

Uranium3006 ,

liberals rolling over for fascism is the reason they're winning. the moment enough liberals draw a line in the sand and hold firm is when it stops.

masquenox ,

Liberals rolling over for fascism is the only way fascists win. There simply is no other way fascists can win.

assassin_aragorn ,

It's only inevitable if we do nothing

Thirdborne ,

So pretty much inevitable then. :(

be_excellent_to_each_other ,

Same paper that just ran the "Women should stop shunning Trump supporters in their dating pool" article. I guess that's so they'll be less likely to abused under the pending dictatorship?

agent_flounder ,
@agent_flounder@lemmy.world avatar

Same author?

Because papers often run a variety of opinion pieces...

be_excellent_to_each_other ,

Good point and probably not, but I'm too lazy to look right now.

Edited to add: Presumably same editorial team, so the seeming dissonance between the two articles isn't lessened much by having different authors.

assassin_aragorn ,

It really depends a lot. If it's something by the editorial board itself, then it's a very jarring difference. But you can have writers with polar opposite viewpoints in editorials. It used to be nice from a reader perspective to get that variety, but then the right went wacko.

That said, I do think it's weird the section editor would approve something like "women need to date more conservatives". Maybe they take the approach of not being responsible for what their authors say, but that crosses enough lines that it's odd they didn't step in.

ChunkMcHorkle , (edited )
@ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world avatar

deleted by creator

spaceghoti ,

It's a good piece and I think the analysis is largely accurate. But there's one thing I think Kagan missed: Trump isn't the only would-be dictator who could take power. He lists DeSantis and Haley as the closest competitors to Trump within the Republican Party, but he doesn't point out that even if, by some miracle, one of them becomes the party nominee, they would assume the very same dictatorial powers Trump is threatening to wield. Neither of them is going to defend democracy when offered the reins of tyranny, and both could easily hold power for decades. Trump maybe has a single decade at most.

The problem isn't simply Trump wanting to be President for Life. The problem is that the path has been cleared for any Republican to assume that role the next time one is elected. Project 2025 won't work for Trump only. The next time we have a Republican President, expect it to be the last time we have a fair election.

Uranium3006 ,

Trump isn’t the only would-be dictator who could take power.

honestly I think only trump has what it takes to form the cult of personality necessary to take over. he's got the charisma to entrance 35% the country. DeSantis is more temperamentally fit to be the lieutenant you send in to do massacres than a figurehead leader

blazera ,

When does this brinkmanship dilemma stop occurring? How long are dems gonna get a blank check to spit in our faces because republicans are a looming threat? Is MAGA gonna be gone in 2028? 2032? When is the income gap gonna stop accelerating? Or emissions? When are houses gonna be affordable, or education? What about the situation is supposed to improve if dems win 2028?

kiljoy ,

You get downvoted for actually expecting something from your vote. I’m sorry some 1/100000000 chance of a president becoming a dictator isn’t going to make me want to vote for someone who doesn’t want to fix economic problems for the middle class. Do better and winning the presidency would be a cakewalk do the bare minimum and possibly lose to Donald Trump.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • politics@lemmy.world
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines