Nationalism is almost always bad, why should Israeli Nationalism be any different?
Ask yourself: if it was any other country or ethnicity, would it be "good" nationalism? Would an American or Russian Nationalist worry you? How about a Rwandan or Serbian nationalist?
Chances are the answer is "yes" (unless you're a fascist), so why does Israeli nationalism get a free pass?
Zionism has always been highly controversial. It is a political movement but it's proponents try and paint it as a central and indelible part of Jewish identity - trying to make it seem as if to attack zionism is to attack Judaism. This is of course utter bullshit.
It's a common tactic of the zionist movement to try and equate anti-zionism with being anti-semetic. But zionism is a nationalist political ideology, not an ethnic identity.
It is not anti-semetic to attack zionism, just as it is not unamerican to attack the Republican Party.
Is it bad that my first thought goes to "have you tried a federal database that keeps track of guns, gun owners, and gun ownership applicants?" And yet I know this new idiocy is far more likely to happen than the much more reasonable yet somehow illegal federal gun registry.
If you think launching defensive measures for an ally is provocative, then how do you view & call launching offensive measures through imperialistic ambitions within a peaceful independent country?
If Russia wants to avoid a conflict with NATO, maybe they should just avoid their illegal aggression and retreat back to within their own borders.
It's not a this or that proposition. Russia is very much aware how to bring NATO into the conflict, yet they don't. If NATO wanted to start a war with Russia, this is one way to do it. But, be careful what you wish for. Unintended consequences.
Last August, CEO Brian Cornell told reporters that Target learned from the backlash and said the company would be more thoughtful about merchandise decisions for heritage months that celebrate the achievements of marginalized groups.
By thoughtful they mean not celebrating the achievements of marginalized groups.
It’s worse than that. It proposes connecting pregnant people with hack job services that do not offer or consider abortion. You know, those places that prey on vulnerable women specifically to coerce them into having a baby whether or not that’s actually the right decision for them. It promotes ideology and dogma over science and dignity.
And I write women here because those services are most certainly not up-to-date with modern gender ideology. Conservative healthcare isn’t healthcare, because healthcare is science. Or at least it’s supposed to be.
It would be really gross seeing a pregnancy.gov website promoting ideas that hurt women.
America keeps fighting fascism outside of US, but invites it with open arms to their legislative bodies. Look for the post in !databreaches once the data is inevitably leaked.
EVs only minimizes the CO2 consumption, since actual car production (especially batteries) creates stitton of CO2. So while it's better, incentivizing something that still contributes to the problem is not a real solution.
brb gonna change my private school's status to a urinal because I believe that women's place is at home and therefore they shouldn't get any education. For a good a good measure, I'll do the same to the office building, the driving school, and the airline I own.
Does it matter what they admit? These companies always wait for many years to admit anything. By then the damage to people is done.
Of course one could argue that if everyone would vaccinate, almost everyone would be better off, except people with side effects. But I can absolutely understand why people don't want to risk being that person getting side effects. There is no help to be had if you are that person.
Interesting Global News
Active
This magazine is not receiving updates (last activity 0 day(s) ago). Subscribe to start receiving updates.