signal.org

TheFrirish , to Privacy in Signal introduces usernames and phone number privacy.
@TheFrirish@jlai.lu avatar

I mean it's nice but I do not know a single pirson who uses signal

TheColonel ,

Hi friend!

Now you do.

Spearman3618 ,

Some people switched when elon asked them to. Then they went back to the meta app.

FrankTheHealer , to Privacy in Signal introduces usernames and phone number privacy.

Great news. Thank you Signal

onlinepersona , to Free and Open Source Software in Signal Blog: Keep your phone number private with Signal usernames

As usual, people are never satisfied. Never stop complaining.

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

psychothumbs , to Privacy in Signal introduces usernames and phone number privacy.

I'm still just so furious at Signal management for removing compatibility with other text apps. I used to be constantly growing my Signal network, now it's a slowly shrinking rump that I never add anyone to.

FrankTheHealer ,

Wasn't that compatibility based on SMS which is inherently insecure?

UnsavoryMollusk ,

Yer

psychothumbs ,

Right, the idea was that you could use Signal as your SMS app, and so whenever there was someone else doing the same you'd automatically upgrade to Signal. Whereas now I never have those auto-upgrades, any new contact I am just stuck on SMS with.

FrankTheHealer ,

In my opinion, relying on upgrading users automagically to an encrypted and secure protocol isn't good practice. If someone wants to use an encrypted chat, they should do so consciously. It will only cause confusion otherwise.

Do people still use SMS these days though anyway?

I would have thought iMessage, RCS and separate chat apps like Whatsapp, Signal and WeChat would have largely replaced SMS by now.

psychothumbs ,

In my opinion, relying on upgrading users automagically to an encrypted and secure protocol isn’t good practice. If someone wants to use an encrypted chat, they should do so consciously. It will only cause confusion otherwise.

This is my theory for why they ditched this feature - the ultra-concerned about privacy superusers don't approve of its messiness, even though in practice it's the main engine for user growth.

Do people still use SMS these days though anyway?

I would have thought iMessage, RCS and separate chat apps like Whatsapp, Signal and WeChat would have largely replaced SMS by now.

SMS, MMS, iMessage and RCS are all compatible with each other and mostly used interchangeably and are the main way people text each other (in the US anyway). You just have a phone number, and when people text it with any of those formats you receive the message and respond the same way.

xcjs ,
@xcjs@programming.dev avatar

On Android, it moved SMS messages from the shared SMS store upon receipt and to Signal's own database, which was slightly more secure.

guts , to Privacy in Signal introduces usernames and phone number privacy.

Still register with a phone number is a red flag. I prefer SimpleX.

kksgandhi , to Privacy in Signal introduces usernames and phone number privacy.

Great feature, but if I'm reading it correctly, you won't be able to chat with someone anonymously (because your profile will still be shared). Are there good apps for that?

hoosierHillPowderedCheese ,

jami

guts ,

SimpleX

scoobford ,

SimpleX was the best for my purposes when I looked, but Briar is a compelling option as well.

The case can also be made for element, but it lacks forward secrecy and honestly the app kinda sucks.

Opafi ,

Threema?

jherazob , to Free and Open Source Software in Signal Blog: Keep your phone number private with Signal usernames
@jherazob@beehaw.org avatar

Many years late, and still requires having your number. Good first step though, we'll see once a phone number is not required.

rah , to Free and Open Source Software in Signal Blog: Keep your phone number private with Signal usernames

Still not in F-Droid

UNIX84 OP ,

This is a big complaint for me. I know that there is the official standalone APK, but if I am running a de-Googled phone, I want to be able to use Signal and have it update on a regular basis.

DdCno1 ,

The app does remind you of updates.

moitoi , to Privacy in Signal introduces usernames and phone number privacy.

It was nice to use it in nightly. It's good it came to stable.

possiblylinux127 , to Privacy in Signal introduces usernames and phone number privacy.
@possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip avatar

Great, I'll get more spam

Link ,

Did you read the article? I don’t think temporary usernames will increase spam.

possiblylinux127 ,
@possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip avatar

I just got a unknown sender sending me unsolicited junk and that's never happened before

American_Jesus ,
@American_Jesus@lemm.ee avatar

Telegram have this in a long time, and I never got any spam messages.

Try to read the article instead.

Atemu ,

Don't bother with this person. All I've seen them do is read the post's title and produce an (often inappropriate) reaction to said title. Peak Redditor.

brbposting , to Privacy in Signal introduces usernames and phone number privacy.

Updated on iOS via US App Store - feature not available just yet. Looking forward to it in a few days perhaps!

zewm ,
@zewm@lemmy.zip avatar

Same for me

ResoluteCatnap , (edited )

found this in the article

Right now, these options are in beta, and will be rolling out to everyone in the coming weeks.

Stewbs , to Privacy in Signal introduces usernames and phone number privacy.
@Stewbs@lemmy.world avatar

About time!! Been waiting for this for so long. This will definitely make the usability of Signal better and it'll also be more accessible to people who wanted a Telegram like way to talk to other folks. Requiring a number to still register isn't a bad thing in my eyes though sometimes it can be frustrating so I hope that there's an option to create an account without a number. Maybe the account will have finite time before it's auto-deleted if you don't input a number some time later to ensure that this option isn't abused to all hell by bots and malicious actors alike.

leanleft ,
@leanleft@lemmy.ml avatar

its a sensible choice because many potential implementers hae been dissuaded by the anxiety attached to risks of giving out phone number. (harrassment, stalker, spammer, scammer) . the telephone system has paralyzed itself in fear. yet we all keep buying their shit.

Neon ,

Maybe the account will have finite time before it’s auto-deleted if you don’t input a number some time later to ensure that this option isn’t abused to all hell by bots and malicious actors alike

we're already banning bots, thus effectively making them time-limited.
Yet we still have bots and spam on there. This sadly won't work.

Stewbs ,
@Stewbs@lemmy.world avatar

That sucks and is quite unfortunate, would've been cool to have another option other than signing up with your phone number but I suppose it's alright

bbbhltz , to Privacy in Signal introduces usernames and phone number privacy.
@bbbhltz@beehaw.org avatar

Relevant info about the username/accountid implementation: https://fosstodon.org/@link2xt/111965597727225353

preasket ,

This is important context. Signal needs to make phone numbers optional...

ArtificialLink ,

Nah.

preasket ,

Yeah.

bbbhltz , to Free and Open Source Software in Signal Blog: Keep your phone number private with Signal usernames
@bbbhltz@beehaw.org avatar

Step in the right direction, which is appreciated...

But: https://fosstodon.org/@link2xt/111965597727225353

Server can look up account identifier (username) and also phone number by username.

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted , (edited ) to Free and Open Source Software in Signal Blog: Keep your phone number private with Signal usernames
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Too little too late, I'm afraid.

I would love to use Signal more, but I have it for only 1 friend. No one else I know uses it. And the fact that they don't support SMS is I imagine a large contributing factor.

(Yes, I know SMS is inherently insecure & unprivate, but having that support is a good way to get users' foots in the door, and also what good is a totally secure platform if no one uses it?)

snowsuit2654 ,
@snowsuit2654@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I still luckily have a nice group of friends using Signal but I agree that dropping SMS support was a mistake. There was a good issue explaining why dropping SMS support was bad on their GitHub: https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Android/issues/12560

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I genuinely appreciate that there are some people who have the benefit of a group of contacts who are willing to use it. I'm happy for you.

Also, that's an interesting thread. Thanks for sharing it. :)

explodicle ,

In hindsight it's sad how very right he was. Now when I think "I want to send Alice a message", I just go to the app I know will work, instead of trying to remember if Alice still uses Signal too.

sfera ,

It's never too late. "Back then", when I started using Signal (called TextSecure), only one other single friend used it. Nowadays, almost all my personal contacts use it. Every additional Signal user adds a contact in someone other's address book as a potential Signal contact. It just takes time. Good luck!

EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted ,
@EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Okay, then, let me reiterate, for now it seems to be too little too late.

And thank you.

Killing_Spark ,

Is this a regional thing? I don't know anyone that actually uses SMS anymore

smileyhead ,

In my region everyone uses Facebook Messenger. And if you don't use it, to contant people that won't install an app for you (like meeting you for first time), the only option is SMS.

Killing_Spark ,

I mean to be honest to only reason to use messengers is just costs, I wish SMS where as cheap as internet flatrates... But that might very well be a regional issue too

smileyhead ,

Just cost? Absolutely no.
Internet protocols are better in so many ways that phone based messaging should be obsolete for years.

Killing_Spark ,

Internet protocols are better in so many ways

This is VERY debatable because statements that broad are almost always false. There is no need to have a cellular->IP->cellular bridge for 1:1 communication involving more servers, more service providers. If anyone wanted to they could implement at least the 1:1 signal protocol and probably even the messaging layer security protocol on top of SMS to get e2ee group communications.

Nobody wants to because cell providers sell SMS for horrendous prices compared to internet access.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines