@Alexbbrown@hachyderm.io cover
@Alexbbrown@hachyderm.io avatar

Alexbbrown

@Alexbbrown@hachyderm.io

Engineering Manager at  Apple
Machine Learning via CreateML and CoreML
Trans Woman - she/hers
Bug filer extraordinaire
Coder in :swift: Swift/SwiftUI

My opinions and posts are my own, I never speak on behalf of anyone or anything else.

I want to help people use computers to achieve non computer goals

My favorite computer game is Outer Wilds. My favorite food is Lasagne, followed by spicy noodles! I love to work out and run

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. For a complete list of posts, browse on the original instance.

other_ghosts , to random
@other_ghosts@kolektiva.social avatar

Hearing Judith Butler speak on the phantasm of contemporary right wing anti-gender discourse last night was so illuminating. I loved the idea of the phantasm: an assemblage of contradictory beliefs and impulses that nevertheless cohere in the mind of the believer, and thereby motivate political action (e.g., is "gender ideology" total reckless freedom or is it totalitarianism that seeks to dictate your relationships and identities? Is it a contagion or a colonial imposition? Etc., etc.).

This is what always bugs me about smug liberal discourse about the right. So many are content to merely point out a logical fallacy or inconsistency, or take a perverse delight in pouncing on instances of hypocrisy. But contradiction is not just accepted in these discourses: it is the point. Right wing discourse is not seductive because it makes sense, it is seductive because it relieves the adherent of the need to make sense. It provides convenient scapegoats to externalize complex insecurities.

Butler responded to a provocative TERFy audience question not by deflating the questioner's ego or pointing out some superficial contradiction in their framing (which certainly Butler is more than sharp enough to do). Despite the fact that these sorts of disingenuous questions have absolutely hounded Butler for decades, they instead patiently but efficiently identified the fears that were motivating the question, and suggested a reframing of the problem. This is how you talk about the fallacies of right wing discourse.

The other strong point that I took away from the talk is that any Left discourse that treats gender as a secondary concern is ill-equipped to confront contemporary fascism, as anti-gender ideology is actually quite central to the discourse of these movements, and is one of their most effective rallying cries. It needs to be understood and taken seriously by anyone who considers themself anti-fascist.

Anyway, their new book is "Who's Afraid of Gender?," and it is targeted at a general audience. I look forward to checking it out.

Alexbbrown ,
@Alexbbrown@hachyderm.io avatar

@other_ghosts is there a recording of the speech you watched?

pluralistic , to random
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

Today's threads (a thread)

Inside: Pluralistic is four; The Bezzle excerpt (Part III); and more!

Archived at: https://pluralistic.net/2024/02/20/fore/

1/

Alexbbrown ,
@Alexbbrown@hachyderm.io avatar

@pluralistic can i buy the audiobook now?

Alexbbrown ,
@Alexbbrown@hachyderm.io avatar

@pluralistic OK I'm feeling real dumb now, no matter how many times I press the above buttons or go to pluralistic.net to read your most recent blog test I can't find the button that says buy audiobook

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines