cdarwin , to random
@cdarwin@c.im avatar

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) announced the #Senate will vote on a bill to protect a person's ability to access #contraceptives this Wednesday.

Why it matters:
The vote on the
⭐️Right to Contraception Act ⭐️
comes just ahead of the second anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court striking down federal abortion rights protections and as Democrats highlight the matter as a key 2024 election issue.

Schumer wrote in a "Dear Colleague" letter released Sunday: "Democrats will be putting reproductive freedoms front and center."

in his concurring opinion overturning Roe v. Wade
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote
that the bench should reconsider
"all of this Court's substantive due process precedents,"
including those guaranteeing birth control access and marriage equality.

Schumer promised in the letter that there would be "more action" after next week's vote on the "Right to Contraception Act"
which is led by by Sens. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii).

State of play:
Schumer noted since the Supreme Court's June 24, 2022 decision in the Dobbs case, that 🔥at least 20 states have imposed near-total bans or severe restrictions on abortion.🔥

"There's no question in the American people's minds that Republicans have brought our country to this point," Schumer wrote.

"And as Donald Trump reminded us recently, he is 'proudly the person responsible' for the annihilation of Roe v. Wade and the grotesque reversal of women's personal freedoms," he added.

"Democrats have been clear we will not stand for these attacks and we will fight to preserve reproductive freedoms.

That is why as we return from the Memorial Day state work period, Senate Democrats will be putting reproductive freedoms front and center."

https://www.axios.com/2024/06/02/schumer-contraception-vote-birth-control

Senate will vote on H.R.8373 on Wednesday

🔸The bill would guarantee the legal right for individuals to get and use contraception and for health care providers to provide contraception, information, referrals and services related to contraception.

🔸It would also prohibit the federal government and any state from administering or enforcing any law, rule or regulation to prohibit or restrict the sale or use of contraception.

🔸And it would allow the Justice Department, providers and individuals harmed by restrictions on contraception to go to court to enforce those rights.Justice Department, providers and individuals harmed by restrictions on contraception to go to court to enforce those rights.
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4699207-schumer-tees-up-wednesday-vote-on-contraception-bill/

Frankyt ,
@Frankyt@mastodon.social avatar

@cdarwin How much of this legislation is just for show, Schumer should know he will never get this through the House with the current political climate.

Npars01 , (edited )
@Npars01@mstdn.social avatar

@Frankyt @cdarwin

The GOP House margin is razor thin.
https://newrepublic.com/post/180194/marjorie-taylor-greene-republicans-house-speaker-jeffries-not-my-fault

Certain swing-state Republicans will vote in favor of it. Some will vote for it out of spite.

The alternative is House Speaker Hakeem Jeffries....
https://democraticleader.house.gov/media/press-releases/leader-jeffries-we-will-crush-extreme-maga-republican-effort-criminalize

This kind of "Let's see if it works" testing will occur more & more as we approach the elections. It gets those evasive snakes in the GOP, on the record.

wdlindsy , to random
@wdlindsy@toad.social avatar

"The same folks who laughed when women became concerned about Roe v. Wade after Trump confirmed three Supreme Court justices during his time in office will push this one aside. That would be a mistake. …

Remember the ads about the Republican congressman in your bedroom? Next up is Justice Alito deciding what you can get at your pharmacy. It’s a slippery slope."


/2

otownKim ,
@otownKim@toot.community avatar

@wdlindsy The day RBG died I was inconsolable! I'm still sick to my stomach daily when I see the consequences of this illegitimate Traitorous SCOTUS.

wdlindsy OP ,
@wdlindsy@toad.social avatar

@otownKim I'm in the same place,

GottaLaff , to random
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

Via Lawrence Tribe:

The Trumpers are now going for the jugular in attacking the great 1965 precedent on which nearly all federal rights of privacy and personal autonomy depend, Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479, upholding the right to use when having sexual relations.

-Harris HQ:

Top supporter Marsha Blackburn says Griswold v. Connecticut is “constitutionally unsound”

(Griswold v. Connecticut is the 1965 Supreme Court ruling that legalized birth control)

Blinxeto ,
@Blinxeto@mastodon.social avatar
Npars01 ,
@Npars01@mstdn.social avatar
GottaLaff , to random
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

Many of us have been sounding the alarm on this for years.

Welp.

Via Kyle Griffin:

In an interview with KDKA-TV, says he's "looking at" policies that would restrict access to

Gardenermerc ,
@Gardenermerc@mastodon.social avatar

@GottaLaff I will never forgive those who withheld their votes for HRC for this nightmare.

michaelgemar ,
@michaelgemar@mstdn.ca avatar

@GottaLaff Well, we know he doesn’t like condoms…

wdlindsy , to random
@wdlindsy@toad.social avatar

"Griswold v. Connecticut is the 1965 Supreme Court decision that legalized birth control. Last week, Tennessee Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn called the decision 'constitutionally unsound.' Blackburn, formerly a member of the Tea Party faction of the Republican Party and now staunchly pro-Trump, is not a lawyer."

~ Joyce Vance


/1

https://joycevance.substack.com/p/the-week-ahead-366

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines