jordanlund ,
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

I personally know people who lived under Israel's illegal occupation of Lebanon. If America knew even HALF of the shit they get up to, we would demand all funding be cut off immediately.

filister ,

Don't be naïve, the US knows it, but simply they don't care, as it doesn't fit their narrative

jordanlund ,
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

The US government knows it, the US citizens are almost wholly ignorant of it.

Poggervania ,
@Poggervania@kbin.social avatar

Reminder that major news outlets like CNN, MSNBC, and Fox just buy their stories from news agencies like Associated Press and Reuters specifically so they can adjust the stories to their agenda. This is why they are news outlets, not news agencies.

If you legitimately want news just being presented as-is, just go to the source and read it directly from the agency. I personally haven’t seen a slant when reading from either Reuters or AP.

OurToothbrush Mod ,

Really, you've never detected slant from Reuters or AP?

I agree that cnn, fox, etc are outlets and not agencies but calling the agencies unbiased is also wrong.

rxbudian ,

What would be considered slant?
a guide would be good here for defining slant so everyone can go through a checklist and say, yeah that article or news agency's articles are slanted

trebuchet ,

Pretty rare to see an honest reveal on how much of a propaganda mouthpiece one of these big Western news agencies is.

Now if only people will remember this and not come down with Gell-Mann Amnesia the next time the free press is pushing people to hate a group or take sides in a conflict.

The thing about this is, it's not like CNN's coverage of this is different than that of the other Western media outlets, so presumably the same things are happening in every one of their newsrooms. They all did things like dehumanize the Palestinians by referring to their deaths in the passive voice.

HuddaBudda ,

Something happened to CNN after fox news had to pay 878 million dollars from the dominion lawsuit.

They went from pure left wing commentary, to giving trump a platform to spread more lies.

Then they just started running with it.

Now they are stuck with left wing staff, required to argue for right wing talking points for their right wing audience.

chaogomu ,

That something was that they were bought out by a right wing billionaire.

yeather ,

No it isn’t, being generally pro israel is just the unpopular opinion rn, it will flip back within the decade.

Hegar ,
@Hegar@kbin.social avatar

The article is not talking about pro Israel opinions.

It points out specific ways that current practices are leading to credulous and untrustworthy reporting. And highlights the history that the current editor in chief (who began 2 days after oct 7) has of bowing to Israeli government pressure in his previous role at the BBC, including firing specific staff at their request.

It is obviously not credible journalism to just take the word of a government at war. Governments lie, moreso when they are at war.

ksynwa ,
@ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml avatar

It would be if they were a journalistic outlet rather than a nonsentient mouthpiece for the US state department and its allies.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • worldnews@lemmy.ml
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines