hrefna OP ,
@hrefna@hachyderm.io avatar

But this is not what they are doing. They are talking about how "we are treating people without high quality results! This is dangerous!"

  1. This clearly implies that they are discarding the evidence they have labeled as "low quality."

  2. You always have to ask "what would be the study design that would satisfy you for this?" The answer here is not ethical, which leads to the conclusion that no evidence will satisfy them.

  3. They are using very misleading framing.

4/

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines