@datarama@xkummerer@mary Grammarly for coding, in other words? Except I can tell you, as someone who has both worked professionally as an editor and done a bit of purely amateur, hobbyist-level programming (back when it was called "programming" and not "coding"), that Grammarly is often wrong, and reviewing code for its functionality is a way more difficult task than proofreading text for its adherence to conventions.