gerrymcgovern ,
@gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green avatar

"In 2022, the world generated a record 62 million tonnes of e-waste—an amount that would fill 1.55 million 40-tonne trucks, enough to wrap around the equator—according to the Global E-Waste Monitor 2024, a new report from the United Nations. (That’s up from 53.6 million tonnes in 2019, per the last UN report.) And that waste is expected to keep growing: It’s rising globally by 2.6 million tonnes a year."

https://www.fastcompany.com/91063587/were-creating-mounds-of-toxic-e-waste-and-recycling-isnt-even-close-to-keeping-up

gerrymcgovern OP ,
@gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green avatar

"The U.N. says 22% of the e-waste mass was properly collected and recycled in 2022. It is expected to fall to 20% by the end of the decade because of “staggering growth” of such waste due to higher consumption, limited repair options, shorter product life cycles, growing “electronification” of society, and inadequate e-waste management infrastructure, the agencies said."
https://apnews.com/article/electronic-waste-kenya-united-nations-ewaste-environment-e37667e5a6b08fe8ef161d386eb3404d

Even when we recycle we only get back about 30% reusable materials, so the true recycling rate is 5%

FantasticalEconomics ,
@FantasticalEconomics@geekdom.social avatar

@gerrymcgovern

"Recycling" is a euphemism for greenwashing. Change my mind.

The above is another great article showing the same thing. Recycling has never worked and relying on it is a fools game.

If systems were dramatically changed it could certainly play an important part in moving us towards sustainability, but it cannot work under the current capitalist system that prioritizes profits; recycling is simply too expensive when externalities are ignored, as they always are.

CelloMomOnCars ,
@CelloMomOnCars@mastodon.social avatar

@FantasticalEconomics @gerrymcgovern

The Right-To-Repair laws should be a start in making a dent in e-waste. Also the EU mandate that all things should be compatibly connectable with all the accessories. We at least don't have to buy a new charger with every new phone.

Now to curb planned obsolescence.

I would love to keep the box and upgrade only the boards and other parts, and only if I really have to.

CelloMomOnCars , (edited )
@CelloMomOnCars@mastodon.social avatar

@FantasticalEconomics @gerrymcgovern

What getting rid of planned obsolescence (& most e-waste) could look like:
I keep my phone / laptop forevah (a car's body rusts, a phone's doesn't), for 30 years.*

– Phone / laptop makers must maintain OS security for 30 years.
– New devices / software must be back-compatible for 30 years.
– Boards, batteries, other parts can be upgraded by swapping in.

*30 yrs: like the way a person needs three bikes in their lifetime, or (in the old days) three horses.

scribe ,
@scribe@mastodon.sdf.org avatar

@CelloMomOnCars @FantasticalEconomics @gerrymcgovern Also some kind of public domain style release after that, like schematics and anything else relevant becomes open for all to use.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines