What if I fully expected the result for practical and policy reasons, but think the reasoning is still atrocious, undercuts the originalist principles that the majority of Court purports to decide on, further upends the federal power/federalism balance (based on a seed Justice Story planted wrongly ages ago), and extends its holding far beyond what needed to be addressed with minimal justification, particularly when there’s a much more intellectually honest method to get the Court where it obviously wanted to go?
🤔
(I know you addressed that. I’m just being sassy 😉)