ajroach42 ,
@ajroach42@retro.social avatar

I saw a thread earlier which started with a variation on the idea that, on the fediverse, anything that is possible is permissible, and that folks should focus their efforts on changing what is possible.

And then the author suggested that the best way to do that would be to get the "fedi devs" together for a "community engagement" town hall, to take feedback from the community on what should be possible, I guess?

All of this is wrong and bad.

I'm not going to engage in the original post, in spite of the fact that I disagree with it, because I don't actually feel like talking to the author of the original post. I am, however, interested in exploring the ways in which this is wrong and bad, because most of it sounds pretty compelling on the surface.

ajroach42 OP ,
@ajroach42@retro.social avatar

So, first, the idea that anything that is possible is permissible is false on it's face.

If I don't lock my car, it's possible for you to take things out of it. That's still theft.

If I post publicly, it's possible for you to copy what I've posted without attribution. That's still plagiarism.

If I am standing in public, you can call me names. That's still rude as all hell.

The idea that anything that is possible should be permitted online is in direct opposition to thousands of years of culture, law, and custom.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines