heidilifeldman ,
@heidilifeldman@mastodon.social avatar

There is total continuity from the early 1970s dawn of so-called “modern American conservativism” and today’s Republican crime syndicate.

With the Heritage Foundation back in the news because of this, ‘lawandcrime.com/high-profile/p… I thought it might be helpful to put the organization in context. 1/

heidilifeldman OP ,
@heidilifeldman@mastodon.social avatar

Modern American conservatism fuses ideas from libertarianism, Chicago-School free-market economics, and white Christian evangelicalism, with the goal of reversing the New Deal and the post-World-War-II civil rights movement. 2/

heidilifeldman OP ,
@heidilifeldman@mastodon.social avatar

Modern American conservatism approves only a very small range for government action. Government may act to maintain order, stability, and certain kinds of hierarchy, and only it if does not encroach upon the prerogatives of appropriate churches (white evangelical Christian ones and those with comparable tenets and practices), acceptable families (heterosexual, two-parent, patriarchal), and the free market (capitalist). 3/

heidilifeldman OP ,
@heidilifeldman@mastodon.social avatar

Modern American conservatives believe in inherent authority of the church, the patriarchal Christian family, and an unfettered market. The view also rests on a belief about the incompetence of government. Government is too removed, too big, too clumsy for tasks other than minimal order-keeping. When government does properly maintain order and stability, individuals and nongovernmental organizations can attend to all the other tasks government might attempt but is likely to botch. 4/

heidilifeldman OP ,
@heidilifeldman@mastodon.social avatar

The founding proponents of modern American conservatism started to advance their views as early as 1951, when William Buckley wrote God and Man at Yale. If you are not familiar with this book, you can get an idea of it from this highly critical contemporaneous review. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1951/11/the-attack-on-yale/306724/ 5/

heidilifeldman OP ,
@heidilifeldman@mastodon.social avatar

In 1960, Buckley’s brother-in-law ghost-wrote a book published under Barry Goldwater’s name, titled The Conscience of a Conservative. This was the first popular statement of the tenets of modern American conservativism and how they should be operationalized. 6/

heidilifeldman OP ,
@heidilifeldman@mastodon.social avatar

By the early 1960s and 1970s, modern American conservatism fueled resistance to racially integrated schools, led by Jerry Falwell, and to resistance to the Equal Rights Amendment and insistence on patriarchal heterosexual marriage, led by Phyllis Schlafley. 7/

heidilifeldman OP ,
@heidilifeldman@mastodon.social avatar

Meanwhile, business interests were coalescing around political action to rollback environmental and workplace safety regulations. The American Medical Association, fighting legislation that ultimately formed Medicare and Medicaid, created PAC in 1961 to raise money for candidates who opposed programs like these. Copying that example, board members from the National Association of Manufacturers started the first corporate PAC, the Business-Industry Political Action Committee (BIPAC) in 1963. 8/

heidilifeldman OP ,
@heidilifeldman@mastodon.social avatar

To be continued. 9/

meltedcheese ,
@meltedcheese@c.im avatar

@heidilifeldman Great thread, waiting for next installment! A lot of people don’t understand how we got to this point in the history of conservatism. I hope people recognize that “conservative” is not an accurate label.

ArrowbearMoore ,
@ArrowbearMoore@toad.social avatar

@meltedcheese @heidilifeldman WC's take on the term this morning. It seems the more accurate descriptive of that party is now Delusional. https://wickershamsconscience.wordpress.com/2024/07/03/whats-a-conservative/

heidilifeldman OP ,
@heidilifeldman@mastodon.social avatar

Starting in the 1970s the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce decided to “modernize” — that is to organize as lobbying outfits dedicated to rolling back OSHA, environmental protection, and product liability law. In 1973, NAM moved headquarters from NYC to DC and created a "Government Affairs Division.” 10/

GreenFire ,
@GreenFire@mstdn.social avatar

@heidilifeldman
This could so easily describe so much contemporary "conservative" garbage that is being published too.

"God and Man at Yale, written by William F. Buckley, Jr., is a savage attack on that institution as a hotbed of 'atheism' and 'collectivism.' I find the book is dishonest in its use of facts, false in its theory, and a discredit to its author."

By McGeorge Bundy, 1951

GreenFire ,
@GreenFire@mstdn.social avatar

@heidilifeldman
Edited to note that you were writing a post on the Powell Memo at the same time I was writing this.

I haven't noticed that you've brought up the memo that Powell circulated among conservatives post-Watergate prior to him becoming a justice on our SCOTUS?

That seems like a forerunner to
https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/democracy/the-lewis-powell-memo-a-corporate-blueprint-to-dominate-democracy/

heidilifeldman OP ,
@heidilifeldman@mastodon.social avatar

In 1971, the Chairman of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Education Committee recruited Lewis Powell to write a memorandum intended to rally the business community to political action. The Powell Memo argued that an overall attack on capitalisms was responsible for regulatory laws, public spending, labor laws, and higher taxes. The solution, according to Powell, was concerted political action spearheaded by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. 11/

heidilifeldman OP ,
@heidilifeldman@mastodon.social avatar

The Chamber of Commerce responded wholeheartedly, with internal reorganization, increased contributions to BIPAC, and the funding of “affiliated organizations” dedicated to using the courts and state governments to eliminate regulation of businesses. 12/

heidilifeldman OP ,
@heidilifeldman@mastodon.social avatar

Meanwhile, in 1973 Paul Weyrich co-founded the Heritage Foundation. The other founders were Joseph Coors and Edwin Feulner. From inception, the mission was to unite the push for a pro-business unregulated market and promotion of white Christian patriarchal social policies. 13/

heidilifeldman OP ,
@heidilifeldman@mastodon.social avatar

Here’s a good article on how Weyrich used white supremacist reactions to school desegregation to bring white Christian fundamentalists and evangelicals to political activism. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/05/religious-right-real-origins-107133 14/

heidilifeldman OP ,
@heidilifeldman@mastodon.social avatar

Here’s Phyllis Schlafly on Weyrich: “Paul Weyrich made the conservative pro-family movement into a fighting brigade instead of just a collection of naysayers. We are grateful to him for his extraordinary vision and leadership, and he never disappointed us. Paul was a man of integrity, courage, perseverance and political smarts. We are proud to have stood by his side for so many years.” https://eagleforum.org/pr/2008/12-18-08.html 15/

heidilifeldman OP ,
@heidilifeldman@mastodon.social avatar

Weyrich on Schlafly: She “dressed up the conservative movement for success at a time when absolutely no one thought we could win.” https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/06/obituaries/phyllis-schlafly-conservative-leader-and-foe-of-era-dies-at-92.html. 16/

heidilifeldman OP ,
@heidilifeldman@mastodon.social avatar

My main point at this juncture: when Reagan and the Heritage Foundation embraced one another both of them were committed to, and knew the other was committed to, the full package of modern American conservatism, a package dating back to the 1950s. Continuity of commitment on both sides. 17/

heidilifeldman OP ,
@heidilifeldman@mastodon.social avatar

Just as there was continuity to that point, so too is there continuity from the Reagan era through to today’s Heritage Foundation, Trump, and the Republican crime syndicate. The through lines are insistence that white Christian patriarchal churches and unregulated business set political and social policy and the elevation of the heterosexual, patriarchal family over all other intimate arrangements. The strategy has been the same all along… 18/

heidilifeldman OP ,
@heidilifeldman@mastodon.social avatar

… cripple and eliminate laws and governmental institutions so as to empower white Christian patriarchal churches, businesses, and the heads of heterosexual patriarchal families. 19/

heidilifeldman OP ,
@heidilifeldman@mastodon.social avatar

Whether you date American “conservatism” to the founding, the Civil War and its aftermath, or to the modern form that reacted explicitly to the New Deal and the post-WWII civil rights movement, I find it useful to be aware that the fight for secular constitutional democracy, rule of law, and a government that authentically serves the general welfare has been long and ongoing. 20/

heidilifeldman OP ,
@heidilifeldman@mastodon.social avatar

It puts into perspective the necessity for fighting for these things still and again. 21/21

MaierAmsden ,
@MaierAmsden@mastodon.social avatar

@heidilifeldman You can draw a straight line from Reagan's 11th Commandment to Republicans giving Trump a pass on a litany of serious crimes and offenses. I give Gingrich credit for McCarthyite partisan radicalization. I give Limbaugh and Ailes credit for the systematic undermining of institutions/ partisan cult-building.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines