Nonilex ,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Alan Feuer:

“…the ruling…opened the door for prosecutors to detail much of their #evidence against #Trump in front of a federal judge—& public—at an expansive #fact-finding hearing, perhaps before #Election Day.

“…it will focus on the question at the center of #SCOTUS’ decision: whether the myriad allegations in #Trump’s 45-pg indictment were based on official acts…or unofficial acts….”

#law
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/01/us/politics/supreme-court-immunity-trump-jan-6.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&sgrp=c-cb

ShredderFeeder ,
@ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.com avatar

@Nonilex Everyone seems to forget that "Campaigning" is not an official act. The activities taken in pursuit of re-election are not allowed as "official acts" It's literally what the Hatch-Act documents.

mwyman ,
@mwyman@mastodon.social avatar

@Nonilex does it, though? Will at least the defense not try to do that behind closed doors to avoid spoiling any potential jury?

Nonilex OP ,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

#SCOTUS decided there was no question that #Trump enjoyed #immunity from being prosecuted for 1 of those methods: his efforts to strong-arm the #DOJ into validating his false claims…. That was because the justices determined that Trump’s interactions w/top ofcls in the dept were clearly part of his ofcl duties.

But the justices left Judge #Chutkan w/the substantial task of performing the official-unofficial test for the other 4 methods described in the indictment.

#law #Jan6

PJ_Evans ,
@PJ_Evans@mas.to avatar

@Nonilex
So criming is legal, if you're the president. Nice to know.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines