Too many, huh? Imposition? Well, now you know how we feel.
A federal appeals court has stopped accepting public complaints against Judge Aileen #Cannon — many seeking her recusal from the classified documents case against #Trump — citing a flood of 1,000 filings in recent weeks that appear to be part of 'an orchestrated campaign.' #legal
@GottaLaff I think Jack should just drop the case release the evidence, and present his case to the public before the election. Plenty of other cases can put him behind bars, we just need him out of the White House to do it.
@GottaLaff
I guess the public expressing a collective desire to seek an unbiased judge to conduct a fair trial in a matter of national security is just a bridge too far.
So can we organize a letter dump campaign where we dramatically roll wheelbarrows full of complaints about this compromised Trump soldier posing as a judge and pour them on the court’s steps?
Or would that be considered littering? Sausage-Hands DeSantis would definitely have his private army shoot litterers.
Should the public NOT orchestrate a campaign when a judge REFUSES to hold a hearing on a person duly indicted?
Do we really have to resort to the days of threatening lynching, in order to force judges to fulfill their public responsibility of holding a trial, to avoid mob justice? That's why we as a society HAVE judges, and why trials have well established procedures, to avoid such mayhem.
Cannon has already failed at her job. In one of the most important cases this country has seen. She needs removal, to protect the public interest. And the public interest is in maintaining societal peace. If the court's administration cannot do that, then all bets are off.
Why, it's almost like a kraken of some sort. Or a hydra!
Or maybe it's just that Cannon has been busy spending all her time devising new excuses why she should neither hear the case, nor pass it on to someone who will.
We heard quite a lot this week about why 11 Alabama lawyers are being investigated for 'judge shopping' in an attempt to overturn a civil rights violation. Now, I suppose, is 'judge sitting', perching on a case until it can no longer putting off hatching -- or turning rotten.
@GottaLaff Lawsuits submitted intentionally to go before Matthew Kacsmaryk in order to produce a theocratic result that will land before the extremist theocratic majority SCOTUS are an orchestrated effort. Maybe someone should put a stop to that too.
Their logic reminds me of the day my college cafeteria stopped serving graperfruit juice. When I asked why, they said, "because we keep running out of it."
I saw a post linking to an Aileen Cannon complaint generator the other day.🤭 I think it was a Google Docs document with suggestions on what to say. I watched a video about complaining on her, too, but it was more cautious in its delivery than the Google Docs thing.