rms , 1 month ago https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/24/us-and-uk-to-back-israel-against-icj-while-blurring-their-rafah-red-lines After vowing to oppose any Israeli offensive in Rafah, Washington and London now see nothing fitting their definition of "Israeli offensive in Rafah".
https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/24/us-and-uk-to-back-israel-against-icj-while-blurring-their-rafah-red-lines
After vowing to oppose any Israeli offensive in Rafah, Washington and London now see nothing fitting their definition of "Israeli offensive in Rafah".
quixote , 1 month ago @rms Why? Why, why, why are they folding and just pandering to Netanyahu. I fully agree with the Court that Sinwar is right up there with them (and would be a lot worse if he had enough weapons to do it). But for God's sake, enough already with the payback mushrooming into a hard right project to depopulate and take over Gaza.
@rms Why? Why, why, why are they folding and just pandering to Netanyahu.
I fully agree with the Court that Sinwar is right up there with them (and would be a lot worse if he had enough weapons to do it).
But for God's sake, enough already with the payback mushrooming into a hard right project to depopulate and take over Gaza.