@hrefna Interesting. My vision of ocaml was that it was a language not too much influenced by c++. It's like every languages made after c++ have standards that are not in the syntax of ocaml. I checked when the first version was mad and the timeline and it made sense. I have to learn it this summer for a course on paradigms. For now I assume that I will not use it outside university. The language is kinda hard to read for modern devs, the package manager is slow and awkwardly not verbose enough. I'm still happy to experiment with it. Your vision on that helps me get a better picture of it.