@gimulnautti@mastodon.green cover
@gimulnautti@mastodon.green avatar

gimulnautti

@gimulnautti@mastodon.green

Pirate Politician, Software Developer, MA Musicology (he/him)

Interests:
Culture, Math, Sociology, Philosophy, Music, Demoscene, Games, #NAFO, Writing, Disc Golf, Skateboarding.

Not here for snarky comebacks. A slur is not an argument.

Other fediverse accounts:
@gimulnautti @metapixl.com
@gimulnautti @mastodontti.fi

Blog:
https://gimulnaut.wordpress.com
https://medium.com/@toni.k.aittoniemi

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. For a complete list of posts, browse on the original instance.

gimulnautti , to bookstodon group
@gimulnautti@mastodon.green avatar

When any cognitive beliefs resist disproof by evidence, they are not factual beliefs.

They are secondary cognitive attitudes backed up by religious credence or political fervour.

The backing of the attitude in this case is strong enough to hide/normalise the split and oscillation between factual and imagined reality.

@bookstodon

Neil Van Leeuwen
Religion as Make-Believe: A Theory of Belief, Imagination, and Group Identity

punishmenthurts ,
@punishmenthurts@neurodifferent.me avatar

@gimulnautti @bookstodon
.
interesting stuff. I'm looking internally to see if I think I can see this and explain it to myself . . . I guess I think the non-factual beliefs do not add up to prove what they are meant to - but that those conclusions are sort of built in and in play anyway, and that people need some story, convincing or not for a situation they are not planning to change . . .
.
but I see reversals everywhere, and also neurotype, different built in conclusions for different sorts of people
.
sorry
interesting! ❤️

gimulnautti , to bookstodon group
@gimulnautti@mastodon.green avatar

How do we know beliefs are make-believe?

Because factual beliefs respond to evidence, imaginings do not.


@bookstodon
Neil van Leeuwen
Religion as make-believe: A theory of belief, imagination and group identity

https://www.amazon.com/Religion-Make-Believe-Theory-Imagination-Identity/dp/067429033X

gimulnautti , to random
@gimulnautti@mastodon.green avatar

IMO there is something inherently psychopathic in algorithm-driven social media.

That you have to adjust all your communicative output to ”trick” a number generator capable of faking human emotive response to become noticed, is..

gimulnautti , to random
@gimulnautti@mastodon.green avatar

People who #folllow #amreading

How many times have you read ”Culture” series by Ian M. Banks?

#scifi #bookstodon

gimulnautti , to random
@gimulnautti@mastodon.green avatar

#mathematics people:

I feel there has to be a way of training neural networks to recognise the influence of their training data on the output.

This would probably include training a complementary indexing network + database that would then ”reverse-training” resolve and offer at some predetermined accuracy the #copyright-viable sources for each generated #aiart

I need some help though. A proof would show the companies know it can be done, but they just don’t want to.

#neuralnetworks

gimulnautti OP ,
@gimulnautti@mastodon.green avatar

As to my motivation, looking forward to people making MORE contributions to AI training instead of hiding their work away to protect it from being stolen.

I am not looking for copyright violations, but a new paradigm, where generative models feed back into the creative economy.

For this rewriting of the copyright laws will be necessary. I wrote lengthily about this for the Finnish Pirate party more than a year ago:

https://gimulnaut.wordpress.com/2023/01/13/copyright-wars-pt-2-ai-vs-the-public/

#ai #aiart #copyrightreform

gimulnautti OP ,
@gimulnautti@mastodon.green avatar

In other words: Getting paid a reasonable amount from the model providers would incentivise people to be part of the training data.

Getting also paid from using the models creatively incentivises their use, and this is where copyright reform is most needed.

Instead of remaining a grey area forever, as the industry would sure be happy about, we need legal category for the remix as legit piece of art, not bastardisation.

#ai #aiart #remix #legal #copyrightreform

https://gimulnaut.wordpress.com/2023/04/20/ai-art-is-a-remix-the-djs-of-pictures/

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines
    •