reiver , to random
@reiver@mastodon.social avatar

I noticed that some people on lens-protocol (decentralized social-media network) call it "open social".

Why that is relevant is — I have seen some try to use "open social" as an alternative name for the 'Fediverse'. But it "open social") seems to already be in use elsewhere.

BeAware ,
@BeAware@social.beaware.live avatar

@reiver thank all that is good and wonderful! I kinda hate "Open Social Web". It's like the opposite of "how do you do, fellow kids?" By trying to not sound intriguing at all...😬

wjmaggos , to random
@wjmaggos@liberal.city avatar

Just got/saw a FAVORITE here on a reply to a user from here. Didn't know that was possible yet.

BeAware ,
@BeAware@social.beaware.live avatar

@wjmaggos Yeah. That was part of the private replies update the other day.🤷‍♂️

wjmaggos , to random
@wjmaggos@liberal.city avatar

Hey, now you can ask people who federate but link to accounts that don't, to ask those accounts to also federate. Appropriate and genius cause who else could make the case better, or rude?

wjmaggos OP ,
@wjmaggos@liberal.city avatar

@BeAware

I get that but they are making progress and are huge with legal teams etc. hard to read at this point. if I had a better sense of the business case for doing so, I'd feel more sure I knew where this was going.

BeAware ,
@BeAware@social.beaware.live avatar

@wjmaggos 🤷‍♂️just seems asinine that a single person could get it running for a company that he doesn't even work for, before a multi-billion dollar conglomerate can get it working for their own system.

reiver , to random
@reiver@mastodon.social avatar

Have you tried a Decentralization Social-Media Network OTHER THAN THE FEDIVERSE?

(Ex: bluesky, farcaster, lens-protocol, nostr, etc?)

If "yes", which ones?

Reply with your answer.

BeAware ,
@BeAware@social.beaware.live avatar

@reiver just Nostr. BlueSky isn't decentralized without Bridgy Fed. I do have an account, but to me, it doesn't count as decentralized.

youronlyone , to random
@youronlyone@c.im avatar

re: fediverse:creator “OpenGraph” tag.

What is the prefix='' namespace for fediverse:?

I checked the official website of (see: https://ogp.me) and I don't see the fediverse: namespace anywhere. Which means this fediverse: namespace is not an OpenGraph tag and will more likely not work without a proper prefix namespace, correct?

So, what am I missing here? People are already adding it. O_O

Update: Relevant thread/discussion about this fediverse: namespace.

https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/pull/30398

(Hat tip to @cadusilva )

youronlyone , to random
@youronlyone@c.im avatar

Isn't this a missed opportunity for the , in particular?

«A social app for creatives, Cara grew from 40k to 650k users in a week because artists are fed up with Meta’s AI policies»

https://techcrunch.com/2024/06/06/a-social-app-for-creatives-cara-grew-from-40k-to-650k-users-in-a-week-because-artists-are-fed-up-with-metas-ai-policies/

youronlyone OP ,
@youronlyone@c.im avatar

@BeAware Also, I'm wondering why no photographers and creative folks set up [multiple] instances.

I mean, during the first Twitter mass exodus (Japanese side), Misskey, Pleroma, and Mastodon instances went online one after another. Which was then repeated during the Twitter exodus 2 (Western side).

Then there was the Reddit exodus, and Lemmy and Kbin instances sprung up everywhere.

It's a wonder why that, I don't know, “formula”(?) did not happen in this case. I mean, granted, Cara has been around. But, there were also other platforms around during the earlier mass exodus events.

Hmm… I guess there are few techie people in the photography and creatives community of Instagram? Or, they were disenfranchised by Threads one-way federation? (Other than so very few talked about Pixelfed.)

youronlyone OP ,
@youronlyone@c.im avatar

@BeAware In any case, I guess someone can convince the founder of Cara to consider adding an federation option.

wjmaggos , to random
@wjmaggos@liberal.city avatar

Still want to replace liberal.city with a server name and network of users that could be much bigger and stand for a fedi culture that wants everyone here, as long as they don't harass people. Unpopular opinions and facts not currently widely accepted welcome. Not otherwise branded with any specific ideology or community. Anybody else interested?

BeAware ,
@BeAware@social.beaware.live avatar

@wjmaggos honestly wish I could give thesocial.zone to this ideology.

Unfortunately, I already made an instance there and i read it can cause federation issues to make a new instance on a domain that had one previously.

I feel like it would be a good domain for an instance like this.

I originally wanted it to be "politically-light" but I quickly realized that moderating for other people isn't a passion of mine...😳

the_moep , to random
@the_moep@social.tchncs.de avatar

This is a really cool Social Web/Fediverse logo mosaic that imo. more people should know about and use! https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fediverse_mosaic.svg

wjmaggos , to random
@wjmaggos@liberal.city avatar

Who did/do you follow from via https://bird.makeup that is now also on and enabling federation, such that you can switch your following method? Not sure I can point to anyone that fits this pattern for me :(

youronlyone , to random
@youronlyone@c.im avatar

The first, original, and true, account portability, , is coming to !

@news explained it in an easy to understand way, so be sure to read this article.

https://wedistribute.org/2024/03/activitypub-nomadic-identity/

jfrantzius , to random German
@jfrantzius@mozilla.social avatar

teasered by the same authors:

"a secret new internet you may not have heard of, a paradise to which we may all yet escape."

A hub for the social web
https://www.blog-pat.ch/a-hub-for-the-social-web/

rolle , to random
@rolle@mementomori.social avatar

I actually have no idea how many boosts and favs some of the most successful posts get here in the Fediverse, because my instance shows a fraction of them no matter how successful they are. But guess what? I don’t care! It’s the best part here, to effectively unlearn that like-craving social media trait.

Everyone likes ”likes”, but in here it happens in our own terms and overall the metrics don’t really matter in the end.

BeAware ,
@BeAware@social.beaware.live avatar

@rolle I have learned to enjoy it in the moment more. I enjoy seeing the "popular posts" but it's only relevant to me if they're currently popular.

WorMP3 , to random
@WorMP3@mstdn.social avatar

Starting to get really tired of people telling me “how to use .” I’ll post whatever the fuck I want, you don’t have to engage. Get the fuck off you high-horse about what is, and how should, social media be utilized. You’re doing nothing but sounding like a pompous prick to everyone else. :0450:

BeAware ,
@BeAware@social.beaware.live avatar

@WorMP3 the best way to use it is in the name itself. But I digress, use it how you see fit and you'll get out of it, what you put into it.👍

WorMP3 OP ,
@WorMP3@mstdn.social avatar

@BeAware The crux of the matter lies in how we perceive and define the concept of being "social" on social media. Fundamentally, the very act of posting content on these platforms, regardless of the nature of that content, inherently opens one up to potential responses and interactions from others. By sharing something publicly, we are essentially engaging in a social behavior, as we are inviting others to react, comment, or connect with our post in some way. (1/2)

Flipboard , to random
@Flipboard@flipboard.social avatar

@molly0xfff is a leading cryptocurrency critic, but get to know her and you’ll see she’s anything but cynical about the future of the web. Hear why this researcher, writer and software engineer thinks so in this fascinating conversation with @mike:

https://about.flipboard.com/inside-flipboard/molly-white/

Catch up on past episodes of the podcast in Mike’s Storyboard collection:

https://flipboard.com/@mike/dot-social-the-future-of-the-social-web-3r0pl8ge5dju9965

To learn more about what Flipboard's doing in the fediverse, sign up here:

http://about.flipboard.com/a-new-wave

wjmaggos , to random
@wjmaggos@liberal.city avatar

People have email addresses like me@mydomain.com while also having a website at mydomain.com. What's preventing folks from also having a account using me@mydomain.com? Would it just be confusing? Then there's all the different fedi services.

BeAware ,
@BeAware@social.beaware.live avatar

@wjmaggos raises hand 🤷‍♂️nothing's stopping them besides their own knowledge limitations.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines