Aux ,

Finally! Some countries are starting to make rational decisions!

nicman24 ,

tf wrote that title.. nuclear is defacto renewable

evranch ,

No, it's zero emission but not renewable.

Nuclear fission is actually by definition the least renewable energy source. Even coal and oil are renewable on long enough time scales. But there will never be more uranium than there is right now.

We actually don't have that much of it if we consider the long term future, only a thousand years or so. So nuclear is intended to be a bridge to eventual full renewable power generation and storage, an essential component in the present day but it's still a bridge.

Another thing to consider is that nuclear is the only power source that works in deep space away from the Sun. So if we're serious about exploring the solar system or further, we'd be best not to burn up all of our fissionable material right away.

AbsolutelyNotABot ,

Nuclear fission is actually by definition the least renewable energy source

But if you go according the strict physical principle every energy source is non-renewable

The sun fuses a finire amount of hydrogen, earth has a finire amount of latent heat, the moon a finire amount of gravitational inertia etc.

And there's a little paradox if you think about it, how can fusion be non-renewable but solar, that use radiation from the sun fusion, be renewable?

Aux ,

Fission and fusion are two different things.

CookieJarObserver ,

Its not even zero emission...

evranch ,

What are the emissions, aside from waste heat?

CookieJarObserver ,

The production of the uranium fuel, the gigantic building itself, the transport (the fule gets shipped around the world), the storage after its depleted.

Its definitely better than any Combustion fuels, but not at all better than actual renewables.

Aux ,

Renewables need all of that too plus they generate SHITLOADS of waste.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • world@lemmy.world
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines