ArcaneSlime , (edited )

Odd question, but I noticed the use of "Females" here for which people are often derided because female is supposed to not be used for human women but rather only animal women.

This begs the question: Where do we consider Neanderthals (or whichever pre homo-sapien group is referenced by this timetable) on the "human" scale? Are they human enough that you "should have" said "males and women" to refer to them politically correctly, or are they far enough removed from homo-sapiens not to be considered "human" in this consideration?

I realize this hypothetical is sort of jumping the shark because I doubt neanderthal women are around in large enough numbers to be offended online about it, but it did make me think, which I find fun to do.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • science@lemmy.world
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines