petrillic ,
@petrillic@hachyderm.io avatar

Capitalism distilled.

Krisss ,
@Krisss@mastodon.nl avatar

@petrillic How is this about capitalism most of all?

memeticist ,
@memeticist@jorts.horse avatar

@Krisss @petrillic absent capitalism, boeing would not have a stock-prices-first approach

planes are expensive enough to fairly compensate the labor required to produce them; boeing already has enough financial performance

in general, engineering firms should put safety first, no compromises or exceptions

pomme_s ,
@pomme_s@framapiaf.org avatar

@memeticist @Krisss @petrillic absent capitalism and still airplane for many people, you believe?
I'm not fan of capitalism, not even flying, but.

memeticist ,
@memeticist@jorts.horse avatar

@pomme_s @Krisss @petrillic possibly! no boeing means no airbus, and airplanes were only needed for business for about three decades, during which it wasn't very safe or predictable

Krisss ,
@Krisss@mastodon.nl avatar

@memeticist @pomme_s @petrillic
About time we can just say beam me up (or to New York), Scotty 😉

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines