Texas can require age-verification on porn sites, 5th Circuit judges rule ( arstechnica.com )

One judge dissents, saying Texas law "limits adults' access to protected speech."

Texas can enforce a law requiring age-verification systems on porn websites, the US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled Thursday. The appeals court vacated an injunction against the law's age-verification requirement but said that Texas cannot enforce a provision requiring porn websites to "display health warnings about the effects of the consumption of pornography."

In a 2-1 decision, judges ruled that "the age-verification requirement is rationally related to the government's legitimate interest in preventing minors' access to pornography. Therefore, the age-verification requirement does not violate the First Amendment."

The Texas law was challenged by the owners of Pornhub and other adult websites and an adult-industry lobby group called the Free Speech Coalition. "We disagree strenuously with the analysis of the Court majority," the Free Speech Coalition said. "As the dissenting opinion by Judge [Patrick] Higginbotham makes clear, this ruling violates decades of precedent from the Supreme Court."

Semi-Hemi-Demigod ,
@Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social avatar

“As the dissenting opinion by Judge [Patrick] Higginbotham makes clear, this ruling violates decades of precedent from the Supreme Court.”

Dude, the Supreme Court doesn’t care about the precedent of the Supreme Court anymore. Why would Texas care?

Reverendender ,
@Reverendender@sh.itjust.works avatar

These skin suits are so clueless

orclev ,

Fuckers. Nobody was disputing that Texas could require age verification, the complaint was about requiring their bullshit health warning that has no scientific basis. Corrupt judges just decided to ignore the actual complaint and rule on the part of the law nobody was contesting.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • news@lemmy.world
  • random
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines