Pentagon officials also failed for two days last week to notify Austin’s second-in-command that he had transferred authority to her while he was in the ICU, and while she was in Puerto Rico.
That's the real goof. I don't really see a problem with the secdef being hospitalized and not immediately notifying the President. They need DoD stuff, they call on him, and if he's not available, for any reason, it should immediately fall to the deputy. The White House staff, and especially the deputy, should have been told.
Ultimately this just seems to have been a breakdown in communication, but even if war were declared, I don't think it would have been a significant issue. This is media hype bs to distract from real issues.
Yeah, this was an unprofessional fuckup from a position that should have zero fuckups, but it's not multi-day national news. I'm surprised he's not being fired, but if the president thinks this was a one time thing that won't happen again, that's fine.
I don't blame him, I blame his staff. A routine procedure, meh. But he goes into the ICU, his staff should be notifying the White House and the deputy, and probably the joint chiefs, among others.
I mean, you can get cancer at any age though. Sure, it's more likely when you're old, but excluding people with cancer from public positions seems weird.
I guess, to be more clear, is that his cancer combined with the comorbidity of his age means he is way more likely to experience these kind of complications when it comes to surgery.
So yes, younger people with cancer wouldn't be disqualified from the same position.
But where do you draw the line in a way that wouldn't be heavily abused for political purposes? I'm not very interested in the idea of evaluating people's morbidity as a qualification for office. There are succession procedures and chains of authority to handle these things. It's one thing to argue about age's impact on current mental or physical faculties if those are inhibiting performance, but I do not want hypothetical deaths factoring in.
While I agree with the sentiment no his cancer is not a "national security issue". He has a deputy, he has staff. It's not like the defense department slams to a halt because he went to the hospital.
Also, as stated by others. Anyone can get cancer. Anyone can develop a sudden infection from surgery. Shit happens
It might shock you how familiar I am with this. I'm not stupid, I'm just a guy on the internet with an opinion based on the fact that this knowledge of his complication didn't seem to be being passed on to, you know, important people who might need to know this information before he croaks suddenly.
I'm sorry that I've literally seen Senators die in office recently because these chucklefucks refuse to let go of their grip on power. It's literally an actual issue with our government.
I find it kind of frustrating that people want Austin held responsible when if he was undergoing surgery and then in ICU he might not have been awake or coherent to get someone else setup. Now, there should be a policy in place that says the minute he went in to ICU second in command should have taken over. I’m also not going to be mad the pentagon didn’t tell the public. That’s a national security issue that our adversaries could try to take advantage of.
