I remember we're still on the Red Sea China shit from last night, but have you noticed that both CNN and Pravda Ukraine provided differing stories? You ever get the sense that after years that maybe the people saying the NATO & Ukraine news is both bullshit were right? Maybe we were actually trying to help!
"We need to establish all the exact facts. As much as possible, given that the plane crash occurred on Russian territory, which is beyond our control.
‘Facts’ is the key word now. I have heard from the Commander-in-Chief and the General Staff about the use of the Air Force. The Defence Intelligence of Ukraine is working to find out the fate of all the prisoners of war. The Security Service of Ukraine is investigating all the circumstances.
And I have instructed the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine to inform our partners about the available data. Our country will insist on an international investigation."
Moscow accuses Kyiv of downing the Ilyushin Il-76 plane in Russia's Belgorod region and killing 74 people on board, including 65 captured Ukrainian soldiers en route to be swapped for Russian PoWs. It has not presented evidence.
Ukraine has neither confirmed nor denied that it shot down the plane and has challenged Moscow's account of who was on board and what happened.
And yet CNN already claims that only 5 bodies went to the morgue. Sounds like they want to get ahead of it and write a story saying there is no evidence before it's been provided so they can move on.
And seriously, I need to go back and actually give you an honest explanation of how Reuters and Associated Press and WAPO and NYT and France24 and BBC and The Guardian are essentially part of the same entity
You keep saying they are all related, but the subject matter doesn't support that argument, case in point being CNN report =/ Reuters or Euronews report. Both Reuters and Euronews explicitly stated that no proof was provided by either side about their statements.
I'm open to your explanation, but you need to base that explanation in facts, not just speculation or conjecture.
This wouldn't be the first instance of Ukraine disregarding their own POWs as a liability, in turn they mistreat Russian POWs and use civilian cars and shit. They actually admit to doing all of it on Telegram and these big papers know that, they are sitting on the info until they can act shocked periodically at bad PR shit getting out like Zhorin throwing people into pits.
Can't say how likely or unlikely that is, and I'm afraid not understanding the Cyrillic alphabet prevents me from verifying those claims. But it would not be the first time Ukraine engaged in the same questionable behavior that Russia does.
Though, judging this particular case based on previous acts without either side having any proof to their claims is also unreasonable.
In the meantime (and I do actually intend to go over this thoroughly when I am in the "talk to guy who thinks CNN is left, Fox News is right, and France24/BBC/Guardian/etcetera is neutral" mental mode or else I'm just gonna shitpost at ya) just use translation!
The title is a bit stupid as ICJ has no way to order a ceasefire, but they did rule that Israel and other states part of the convention must prevent genocide from possibly being committed (possibly as the full ruling whether what Israel did until now amounts to genocide is to be decided).
Just to highlight how fucked up the situation is on 2 points, Israel's own judge ruled against them.
Jesus fucking christ. Totally normal country we have here in the US huh
Also nobody with empathy go read the article, I did, it's awful. Horrendous. They basically just tortured this guy to death. You don't need to know the details it's really bad.
That seems like a good idea. If they really want to execute someone, make the official of the state shoot them on video. I'm guessing capital punishment would be almost zero within 10 years, because nobody wants to be seen as a cold-blooded killer, especially when they know that people could review the video.
Nah instead two elections cycles later a candidate will be elected, who will be running ad breaks and monetizing execution videos, all while parading patriotic bullshit.
This would backfire as you'd see people voting for right wingers more because it's "Cool and manly to kill people", you'd also get the foot in the door for legalized bloodsports.
Yes, there was a moment in very beginning about the duke carrying out executions personally and making his sons watch, because that's his responsibility.
Guilt for administering a death has been thought of before; that's part of the reason why there's a firing 'squad'. You have however many people with lethal rounds, and however many people with dummy/blank rounds, so nobody knows for sure whose bullets were live & killed him.
Interesting Global News
Oldest
This magazine is not receiving updates (last activity 0 day(s) ago). Subscribe to start receiving updates.