Satellite to ‘name and shame’ worst oil and gas methane polluters ( www.theguardian.com )

I'll note that while methane is responsible for something like 30% of the observed warming oil and gas leaks are only part of that.

Edit: Washington Post coverage

Edit: New York Times coverage

rickyrigatoni ,
@rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee avatar

I don't want the government to detect my farts from space.

silence7 OP Mod ,

It doesn't have that kind of resolution. Hard to detect anything emitting less than a large cattle feedlot.

rickyrigatoni ,
@rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee avatar

Making a big assumption there.

Goldmage263 ,
@Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works avatar

Easy solution. Only pump butt around feedlots. Anonymity via large data.

dumpsterlid , (edited )

Great, so now even the satellites are woke?

When will it end?

Oh right it will end when climate change catastrophically collapses civilization as we know it.

…you know sometimes I almost have a full conservative thought before my internal logic engine turns on and obliterates it into a mist of stupidity, maybe one day I can get a full one out just to experience what its like to be a dangerous idiot.

Darkard , (edited )

It's just going to be a map of the most industrialised countries and areas within those countries?
Is it going to tell us anything we don't already know?

If these polluters had any shame they would have already done something about it.

MrMakabar ,
@MrMakabar@slrpnk.net avatar

There are a lot of natural sources of methane and the biggest human sources are oil and gas wells and some coal mines. So Europe for example tends to have low methane leakage. However that is using the current satellites, which are not able to detect smaller emission sources.

The other really big one are methane deposits in permafrost and the ocean depths, which could be released, when we reach certain temperature increases. Especially permafrost starts to release methane today, which is one of the earliest tipping points. So we really want to know when that starts to happen.

EDIT: Also methane does not stay in the atmosphere too long. So it lowering emissions would decrease temperatures relatively quickly.

silence7 OP Mod ,

It's going to provide the locations and rate of leak for major new emissions sources, to a pixel size of 100m x 400m, and detect those leaks within 95 minutes. That's enough to find major new leaks quickly and enable a response to them.

In the US, a new methane emissions tax which just went into effect will provide a powerful incentive for infrastructure owners to fix big leaks like this.

SamsonSeinfelder ,

Here are some animations from 2017 with a similar mission object.

There is also this Map from 2016 by Nasa titled "Mapping Methane Emissions from Fossil Fuel Exploitation":

https://eoimages.gsfc.nasa.gov/images/imagerecords/149000/149374/total_gfei_2016_lrg.jpg

tunetardis ,

Satellite to ‘name and shame’ worst oil and gas methane polluters

That's fascinating! Looks like there are some seriously leaky pipelines in Russia and Algeria. They need to get on that.

I wonder why there is a large emission source along what looks like the northern Appalachians? I wasn't expecting that.

MrMakabar ,
@MrMakabar@slrpnk.net avatar

The coal mines.

tunetardis ,

Ah ok, thanks!

MrMakabar ,
@MrMakabar@slrpnk.net avatar

Here is some real data from Sential 5P an ESA satellite:

https://maps.s5p-pal.com/ch4/

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • climate@slrpnk.net
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines
    •