LinkOpensChest_wav ,
@LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I saw one of those posts before you removed it, and I'm still not convinced it was AI. I had a comment on one of my posts accusing me of posting AI when it wasn't AI at all.

I agree with the no AI rule, but some people here are just being busybodies.

unexposedhazard ,

Im not an "expert" but realistically no, there is no sure way. If you figure something out you will probably get rich.

Just as with AI text generators you can sometimes spot it with experience and if you know what you are looking for. But the general consensus afaik is that we are fucked as soon as it gets to the point where you can make deepfakes that would hold up in court.

The only thing we can hope for is cryptographic signing of all media so authorship can be verified but that doesnt solve your problem really.

NateNate60 ,

I don't realistically view deepfakes in court as a real issue. Video and photographic evidence on its own is hearsay. You need to summon the person who made it as a witness to testify.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines