imgs.xkcd.com

ember , to xkcd in xkcd #2893: Sphere Tastiness

There's got to be an 800m wide jawbreaker

Hyperlon ,

That's what Ed Edd and Eddy live on.

Bashnagdul ,
_different_username , to xkcd in xkcd #2956: Number Line Branch

Is that the symbol for bleem?

NOT_RICK ,
@NOT_RICK@lemmy.world avatar

What the hell did I just read?

davidgro ,

A proto-SCP

NOT_RICK ,
@NOT_RICK@lemmy.world avatar

I feel like the ending is supposed to suggest bleem exists but rereading it, it sounds like he smacked 4 jelly beans across the room.

davidgro ,

(spoiler) It explicitly says there were 3 before, but also 3 after one was eaten.

randomaccount43543 OP , to xkcd in xkcd #2945: Broken Model
bomberesque1 , to xkcd in xkcd #2942: Fluid Speech

We English wouldn't only drop the first t, we'd drop the h and the final t as well, 'o pota'o... innit

Aceticon ,

And in my experience (or at least how I as a foreigner was taught the English RP pronounciation), often also the spaces between words.

ZDL ,
@ZDL@ttrpg.network avatar

RP drives me crazy with its bizarre pronunciation rules. Like never pronouncing 'R' unless it's not there.

"Law and order" under RP approximates "lo ran doh duh" where literally every 'R' in the phrase is not spoken, but they jam one in place of the 'W'.

ARGH! THE SPIDERS ARE EATING MY EYEBALLS FROM THE INSIDE!

Viking_Hippie , to xkcd in xkcd #2941: Cell Organelles

I love the explainxkcd meme of marking obviously true statements with [citation needed] and this one has a couple doozies:

Even a single star is far too big to fit in a cell. [citation needed]

The real Golgi was not and is not a tiny alien being who merged with our cells, as the comic and title text imply. [citation needed]

yamanii , to xkcd in xkcd #2929: Good and Bad Ideas
@yamanii@lemmy.world avatar

Every single glasses of mine have had transition lenses, I can't imagine my life without them anymore.

DragonOracleIX ,

Same. Although mine became a lot less useful after becoming a night owl.

Death_Equity ,

I love transitions lenses. I have transitions contacts and they are fantastic.

BearOfaTime ,

Holy cow-had no idea they made those.

Death_Equity ,

They kind of released under the radar because a comedy skit about them came out and gaslighted people into believing they were not a real thing.

I only found them because I went to order contacts and saw the product category.

They aren't as good as sunglasses(but are really awesome) and they don't work much in the car so you will still want sunglasses.

Grandwolf319 ,

Omg, does that mean your “eye color” changes in the sun?

Death_Equity ,

If you keep one eye closed and expose the other to sunlight, you can see the difference. The lenses tint a dark shade of purple. I have dark brown eyes, so you can't really notice the difference easily. There is a purple ring that is most noticeable outside of the limbal ring. They don't turn your eyes black like you had the tint of sunglasses or transitions glasses, which would be cool.

I would imagine someone with lighter color eyes, like really light blue, would have a very noticeable difference.

Something I did notice as the wearer is when the lenses are tinted there is like a contrast filter on your vision so colors look better.

ares35 , to xkcd in xkcd #2923: Scary Triangles

aren't icebergs the 'icebergs of the sea'?

zero_spelled_with_an_ecks ,

Nah, icebergs are the sea of the sharks.

Beryl ,

But aren't the seas the sharks of the seas ?

match , to xkcd in xkcd #2918: Tick Marks
@match@pawb.social avatar

legitimately a good heist concept

randomaccount43543 OP , to xkcd in xkcd #2909: Moon Landing Mission Profiles
towerful ,

it only depicts the means to reach the Moon, more suitable for robotic missions that are not required to return,^[racist comment implying that robots have no right to be repatriated]^

systemglitch , to xkcd in xkcd #2907: Schwa

I don't get it.

paris ,
LemmyFeed ,

I'm even more confused now...

Suburbanl3g3nd ,

All the vowels make an 'uh' sound when you read the sentence out loud

_dev_null ,
@_dev_null@lemmy.zxcvn.xyz avatar

They're all using only the 'uh' sound for every non-silent vowel in each word.

That 'uh' sound is apparently called the schwa in linguistics.

(edit: clarified after i had already hit the post button)

SeabassDan , to xkcd in xkcd #2942: Fluid Speech

Hop-tay'doh

Subscribe, I love these

bjoern_tantau , to xkcd in xkcd #2914: Eclipse Coolnesss
@bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de avatar

I still regret not pestering my parents enough to drive me out when there was a total eclipse in Germany.

Viking_Hippie ,

To be fair, it was a pretty long drive from where you were living at the time, Azerbaijan..

errer , to xkcd in xkcd #2913: Periodic Table Regions

This one’s pretty good.

hperrin , to xkcd in xkcd #2898: Orbital Argument

I mean, no, not really. The gravitational center of the sun-earth system is within the sun itself, so the earth definitely orbits the sun and the sun definitely does not orbit the earth. Let alone the fact that the sun’s movement is predominantly driven by Jupiter. (The gravitational center of the sun-Jupiter system is just above the sun’s surface.)

gapbetweenus ,

Pretty sure you can chose earth as fix point and have everything rotate around it on really strange orbits. Everything is kind of relative.

Ashelyn ,

Wouldn't that break relativity tho if you treat the earth as a fixed point? Stuff really far out would have to be going absurdly faster than light to orbit the earth once every 24h. I feel like that's one of the ways to tell whether or not you're rotating, or stuff is orbiting you.

gapbetweenus ,

Why would objects far out need to orbit earth every 24h?

Wouldn’t that break relativity tho if you treat the earth as a fixed point?

To be honest, physics was never my strong point. If I remember correctly you could chose any point as your observational (?) point but maybe someone with some real physics cred can chime in.

paholg ,

If the earth is fixed (not just in position, but in rotation), you're using a non-inertial reference frame, and things get wonky. But you can make the math work.

Natanael ,

Relativity works when earth is the center because it's relative, we just calculate everything with earth as the frame of reference. It does make a lot of math harder, but that's what we already are doing when using earth based telescopes (although we try to shift the math to a more reasonable frame of reference for most stuff, but earth is always the starting point because we're making all the measurements from here)

douglasg14b ,
@douglasg14b@lemmy.world avatar

Except that any two gravitational bodies orbit a common center...

The Earth orbiting the Sun causes the sun to wobble slightly, moving its orbital center away from its center of mass, which means the sun and earth actually orbit a common center point no?

Even if that center point is within the other body it still isn't the center of that body, therefore they both orbit a shared gravitational center that is not the center of either body.

hperrin ,

I would not call it orbiting if the center is within the body. So, since the center of the sun-Jupiter system is just outside the surface of the sun, I would say the sun and Jupiter orbit the center of their system, but since the center of the sun-earth system is within the body of the sun, I would not say the sun orbits the center of this system. The path the sun takes in this system is entirely contained within its body.

Now, since the sun, Jupiter, and earth are all in the same system, there’s even less reason to say the sun orbits the earth, since the earth has a negligible effect on the sun’s motion.

douglasg14b ,
@douglasg14b@lemmy.world avatar

Just because you believe that a negligible effect means that it shouldn't be called orbiting doesn't change the fact of the matter that there is still a shared gravitational center that both bodies orbit around...

It doesn't matter if it's negligible or not, the fact of the matter is that such a point exists and both bodies orbit around that point.

hperrin , (edited )

Then literally everything is orbiting literally everything else, and the word orbit is completely useless.

I have a gravitational effect on the earth. The earth-hperrin system has a gravitational center that both bodies revolve around. Does that mean the earth and I orbit that center? No, because my effect on the earth is negligible. The absolutely immeasurably small wobble my mass gives the earth is not an orbit. There are bodies much more massive than me that the earth orbits (despite how many Doritos I eat).

To put in less hyperbolic terms, Mars’ moon Phobos and Mars have a gravitational center, deep deep deep within the Martian core that both bodies revolve around. Does that mean Mars orbits this point? I don’t think a reasonable person would say so. A massive body wobbling because of a small body orbiting it is not orbiting. Only one thing in such a system is orbiting.

JayDee , to xkcd in xkcd #2893: Sphere Tastiness

By this logic, beachballs are okay-tasting.

I argue that the real equation would be some form of y= 1/x

viking ,
@viking@infosec.pub avatar

Based on volume, a baseball would still be in between a grape and a melon, so y=1/x doesn't work either.

I'd go for a density based equation rather than volume.

JayDee ,

Astute point. Single-point blackholes must be delicous

Killing_Spark ,

You'll never want to taste anything else, that's for sure

itslilith ,
@itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Assuming taste is also logarithmic, it actually is y=1/x

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines