blog.privacyguides.org

swayevenly , to Technology in "Privacy-Preserving" Attribution: Mozilla Disappoints Us Yet Again

Anyone see the option to turn it off on Android phones?

jabathekek ,
@jabathekek@sopuli.xyz avatar

IMO it's the option in Data collection called Marketing data. It doesn't say it's PPA outright, but it sounds like the same sort of thing. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

reversebananimals ,

It's a desktop only feature, it hasn't been built into mobile I believe

Toes , to Technology in "Privacy-Preserving" Attribution: Mozilla Disappoints Us Yet Again
@Toes@ani.social avatar

Oh wow, that needs to be off by default like yesterday. 💀

KingThrillgore , to Technology in "Privacy-Preserving" Attribution: Mozilla Disappoints Us Yet Again
@KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml avatar

It's all on Ladybird now.

PenisWenisGenius , to Technology in "Privacy-Preserving" Attribution: Mozilla Disappoints Us Yet Again

Well shit. Firefox is still better because it doesn't have the backdoor Google uses to catch and then block people using adblock on YouTube. For now.

cyborganism , to Privacy Guides in "Privacy-Preserving" Attribution: Mozilla Disappoints Us Yet Again

I think there is a big misunderstanding about this feature. People are throwing their arms up in disappointment but in reality this is a helpful feature for privacy.

This post doesn't even explain what the feature is or how it works. If you take the time to go read what the feature actually does, you'll see it's a good feature to have and it really does improve your privacy when you don't have an ad blocker.

Just because Meta participated doesn't mean it's bad. If they only participated as consultants to understand the advertisement system so they can better protect us against it, it's not bad.

timewarp , to Technology in "Privacy-Preserving" Attribution: Mozilla Disappoints Us Yet Again
@timewarp@lemmy.world avatar

I've tried explaining to the Firefox cult that they do a lot of tracking and telemetry by default but they just hurl insults. Time to leave the cult.

sturlabragason ,

I get a lot of beef for Brave. Any viable alternatives that aren’t derivatives of Chromium or FF but are maintained?

JackGreenEarth ,
@JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee avatar

GNOME Web is mostly ok. It breaks on a few sites and doesn't have easy extension support.

sturlabragason ,

Yeah that was exactly the conclusion I reached since asking 😅

girsaysdoom ,

Firefox forks seem to be the best option. Chromium-based browsers still report to Google unless you basically break them.

hal_5700X ,
@hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works avatar

What about ungoogled-chromium?

girsaysdoom ,

I used to run that years ago and what I remembered was that it was a handful to maintain with updates when I used to run it on windows. It could be completely different now, so don't let my past experience hold you back from trying it out.

mrvictory1 ,

Webkit based browsers like safari and gnome web are your only options if you don't want derivatives.

fin ,

tracking and telemetry by Firefox is not even comparable to that of chrome. Google knows you better than you. Firefox's telemetry used to be solely for improving user experience, and not ads and bullshit.

Now that Firefox's gonna show us some ads, I think I have to get away from it as a protest

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines