wholookshere

@wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. For a complete list of posts, browse on the original instance.

wholookshere ,

Okay but like, you also realize gas fees for transactions can get stupid expensive right? Banks don’t have variable rates.

wholookshere ,

Mmmmmm don’t know about that.

The Planck length is the minimum resolvable accuracy of the universe. That doesn’t mean it’s a building block like the electron is.

wholookshere ,

They don’t make “discrete jumps” as in teleportation. They exist stable in discrete energy levels, but that doesn’t imply things don’t move continuously.

wholookshere ,

A real number is the set of both rational and irrational numbers. Nothing about continuous anything.

wholookshere ,

That’s not what I said?

They’re “stable” energy states. That’s all.

wholookshere ,

Being continuous is not actually a requirement of being real.

wholookshere ,

If you want my credentials, the second book is deriving the hydrogen atom.

https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/7fbba8e4-3036-4cd8-b392-b447ff2c18e5.jpeg

wholookshere ,

That’s not what Planck length is. It’s the minimum resolvable accuracy not measurement. Meaning we can’t prove something was somewhere specific beyond the Planck length. Not that it’s the building size of the universe.

https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_length#:~:text=It%20is%20about%201.616255,Planck%20length%20per%20Planck%20time.

it is a common misconception that it is the inherent “pixel size” or smallest possible length of the universe.[1] If a length smaller than this is used in any measurement, then it has a chance of being wrong due to quantum uncertainty

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines
    •