I'm glad that the art decider has come to tell me what is and isnt alowed to be art. Is there any other degenerate non-art you think should be removed? We could have a bonfire.
I mean does this burn all copies of the "movie" in existence? Does this "remove" this project from ever being circulated and punish those who do it to the full extent of the law? Cause I don't think so, so stop trying to liken my disapproval of word soup generation being called "art" with nazism and fascist ideology.
Also I can literally turn that point back to you, who are you to decide what is art? We're literally Lemmy users arguing shit online, don't try to take the high horse.
Book burnings dont remove all copies of a book from existence either. And no I dont get to decide what is and isnt art, and I dont presume to, generally if someone says something they have made is art and they're not asking me to buy it I'm happy for them to consider it art. Also I dont go around cheering when creative works I dont like get censored.
The director, the actors, the camera crew. Take your pick
I fail to see how the director using a tool to help write a script means that everyone else involved in an artistic production suddenly loses all creative input.
This. This was a fucking private hire at a small indie venue many London film buffs and casual enjoyers know and love. Artbros are fascists in very, very thin veils, they scream about being supposedly harassed by pro-AI folks but in reality like all conservatives it's them who do the harassment.
Petty dictators who want to tell others what to think and what's art and what is not, keeping down normal average people and actually interesting artists alike, while their actual industry is a factory of mass-produced general appeal garbage written and produced by focus groups and rooms of executives that contributes to the decay of culture and endless problematic myths that haunt society all because of some narcissist sex pest in Hollywood.
