NAS vulnerabilities ( www.theregister.com )

Just stumbled across this (overly dramatic?) article and thought I'd just post it here...

It's more to act as a reminder that if you've got a NAS that is serving content to the interwebs, then make sure it's behind a proxy of some kind to prevent weaknesses (ie in the management Web UI) being exposed.

Obvz, this article is pointing to Zyxel, but it could be your DIY home-built NAS with Cockpit: CVE-2024-2947 - just an example, not bashing that project at all.

I've used Squid and HAProxy over the years (mostly on my pfSense box) - but I'd be interested to know if there's other options that I've not heard of

Decronym Bot ,

Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:

Fewer Letters More Letters
HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol, the Web
NAS Network-Attached Storage
nginx Popular HTTP server

[Thread for this sub, first seen 26th Jun 2024, 05:55]
[FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

Moonrise2473 ,

I had one of those NAS (NSA320). Even when they were new and suppoted they were using some ancient custom version of linux with ancient packages. It would be insane to expose them on the internet.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • selfhosted@lemmy.world
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines
    •