On my home instance, the community !meta is for discussing issues specific to the instance, it's not really relevant to people not using the instance.
On startrek.website, the Quarks community seems to primarily discuss Star Trek adjacent topics which are of interest to many Trek fans.
I think it's great that you guys want a private community for discussing things only relevant to the instance. I just wish you hadn't chosen to close a community with broad external interest.
We'll probably relax the rules on c/startrek a bit to allow a degree of Trek-adjacent content that we might have previously punted to Quark's.
I'm thinking of stuff like the Paramount acquisition drama, which is off-topic but clearly still relevant.
Expanding outward from there into stuff like "here's what Frakes is up to," we approach territory that can be covered just as well elsewhere in the Fediverse.
And to be clear, Trek-adjacent discussions will continue to be allowed in Quark's. I just don't think making the community private will be some great blow to the Fediverse.
If it helps, we will allow sales of expired Yamok sauce in c/startrek, provided the seller can produce a certificate of authenticity.
I just don’t see how closing everyone else out from Trek adjacent discussions helps the community.
The whole point of federation is letting people with varied interests come together. It doesn’t work if every niche interest makes their “general” board private.
If the concern is that we're going to have a sooper secret, members-only Star Trek discussion group, that is not the intent. If we were going to do that, we'd just make the instance private.
Instead of drawing folks into the fandom tent with adjacent topics or broadening the discussion of established fans, it’s creating less conversation.
I think that there’s a place for a ‘discuss the health of the instance’ conversation on a separate dedicated community, but also a Trek-adjacent general and open discussion. I consider Frakes’ career as a sci-fi director or the Paramount saga as adjacent.
As long as it meets the norms of the instance in terms of civility, why not? Are the admins/mods truly being flooded with a high volume of spam from outside on Quarks?
Last, I would like to note that without Quark’s being open, I doubt we’d have had the interest to create the Dr Who community. I think that it’s cool that it percolated up through the discussion.
I hear you, but "drawing folks into the fandom tent" was not what Quark's (or the instance for that matter) was created for. Quark's has always been "General off-topic chat for the crew of startrek.website.".
That said, if you or anyone else wanted to create a community with that or a related stated purpose (and promised to grow and actively maintain it in line with instance values) I would be more than happy to entertain the idea. But you can't have mine lol
I only discovered this place after I was on fedi for 3+ years. It's incredible and amazing to be able to participate remotely. I honestly can't fathom why you WOULDN'T want that. But hey if they want to close it then bye I guess.
@ValueSubtracted oh I completely understand now that liking, boosting, or privately enjoying posts is not an acceptable level of engagement in an online community where "participation" is required. Thanks 🖖💫
If I'm not out of line in responding, I'd like to chime in for myself per relevant context:
I've been a Trekker since I was tiny, and it was part of my life long before I was a Furry Fan (January 1992).
I mean, Caitians were always a big deal for me as a fan during my youth in the early 1980s, long before I knew Shibolene and her kin were honorary associates of the Fandom.
That fandom interest led to my Treksona Ka'tch'Ian M'Ress, evolving into the TOS version and late-DS9 version of the same name, grandfather and grandaughter to each other
Both of them are now resident cast of my late-TOS novel Nyota-Mtoto (2022) and my post-finale DS9 novella series Season Eight/Why We Boldly Goethe, the prologue and first three tales currently written and the fourth and fifth in progress.
To wit, I would not have my interest in Furry Fandom- and why I prefer the instances Meow.social (current posting) and Macrofurs.social (secondary)- had I not begun with Trek, but also because I have a stronger connection personally to friends in my particular fandom of residency.
That includes my heart-cat Jenora, as she's called by choice online; my lovely one, best friend and the beloved and patient gentlewoman who took me to my first science-fiction convention in 1994 then taught me the narrative trade, and we're both Trekker and Furry Fans.
I cannot divide my interests or my narrative trade meeting to my drawing and writing work of either veterancy nor my bread and butter any more than I have, and I'll respect your choice to restrict Quark's access to startrek.website users if that's your preference.
I don't feel poorly served by this choice, but I felt my input would not be unwelcome even if it wasn't directly bidden nor requested.
Thank you for letting those in our mutual group know of Quark's admin decision ahead of time, whatever your choice sustained or amended will be in the end.
Goofy decision. I have an account here, but I rarely use it because of the ratio of spam to genuine posts on the instance.
You could always just defederate from those toxic instances? It seems like this isn't a popular decision with the community. Might be worth rethinking it.
I think she's saying she's upset we don't remove enough content from other communities (federated with us but not originating) on this instance. Which is correct, the admins here generally leave content on other communities alone if they are actively moderated.
Ok nevermind she's apparently saying /c/StarTrek and /c/Risa are "spam"?
Per instance guidelines, submitting on-topic content to relevant communities is not considered spam. But if you want to stay subscribed to /c/STO and block ValueSubtracted's "spam" StarTrek.website has a block feature you can find on their userpage.
I do like the non-spam content on this instance, such as Quark's and Daystrom. I'm subscribed to it through other accounts, but occasionally I poke my head in on the actual account I have here.
Personally, with most of the instances I actually use, I find it easier to just look at the Local feed. On this instance, however, a significant portion of what gets posted is just repetitive spam, so it's hard to really do that. It's much easier to subscribe to individual interesting communities, such as Daystrom and Quark's, through other instances that I'm more likely to actively use.
I suppose if you don't care what kind of experience anyone has on your instance, that's your business.
The admin team doesn't make instance decisions based on what's "popular". It's actually against our mission statement. Though that doesn't mean community input is ignored.
But that being said, admins can see who's voting and we can see that the downvotes are not coming from users with much/any history in this community. So we are not taking their feedback strongly into account.
Quark's
Oldest