null , 3 months ago Easy, just replace the == with “is” "Is" is not a valid replacement for "==" in this context. For your proof to work, you need to prove that they are literally equivalent, and that the words in that order share an exact, equivalent definition. Go ahead professor, prove it.
Easy, just replace the == with “is”
"Is" is not a valid replacement for "==" in this context. For your proof to work, you need to prove that they are literally equivalent, and that the words in that order share an exact, equivalent definition.
Go ahead professor, prove it.